Towards cleaner semiconductor packaging: Life cycle assessment of material and location decisions on carbon and water scarcity footprints

Semiconductor devices drive technological innovation needed for the transition toward more sustainable systems; however, their manufacturing entails significant environmental burdens, including greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and water scarcity. This study conducts a life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental performance of two major semiconductor packaging types, Lead Frame (LF) and Flip Chip (FC), using gold (Au) or copper (Cu) bonding wires. Carbon footprint (CF) and water scarcity footprint (WSF) are quantified in accordance with ISO 14067 and ISO 14046, respectively, using the ReCiPe and AWARE methods, with a functional unit of 1 mm³. Results indicate that FC-Au wire has the highest CF ( 2.72E-03 kgCO₂eq) and overall environmental impact (2.43E-04 Pt), driven mainly by electricity consumption and upstream raw material production. The same configuration exhibits the highest water use (3.62 E-03 m 3 ), and a WSF evaluated at 2.49 E-03 m 3 world-eq. Incorporating regional water scarcity data reduces WSF values by up to 71.19%, noting the importance of spatial resolution. An alternative assessment with a FU of one piece confirms this trend. Cu-based packaging represents a more sustainable alternative to Au-based packaging, exhibiting significantly lower environmental impacts and water scarcity burdens. These results provide actionable insights for material selection and for identifying sustainable manufacturing locations, particularly in regions such as Japan and Malaysia, within the semiconductor industry. • Two impact LCA-based methods were used to assess the environmental impact of semiconductor packaging • LCA results show that material and packaging types strongly affect environmental impacts. • Copper-based lead frame (LF-Cu) packaging offers the lowest carbon and water footprints. • Water scarcity impacts vary up to 20× across regions, stressing site selection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cleaner Waste Systems
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clwas.2025.100467
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards cleaner semiconductor packaging: Life cycle assessment of material and location decisions on carbon and water scarcity footprints

Ching‐Ying Lin, Lance Hongwei Huang, Allen H. Hu, Chien-Hung Kuo et al.
Cleaner Waste Systems
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Towards cleaner semiconductor packaging: Life cycle assessment of material and location decisions on carbon and water scarcity footprints

Ching‐Ying Lin, Lance Hongwei Huang, Allen H. Hu, Chien-Hung Kuo, Jia-Yi Thum, Ali Ouattara
article en

Abstract

Semiconductor devices drive technological innovation needed for the transition toward more sustainable systems; however, their manufacturing entails significant environmental burdens, including greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and water scarcity. This study conducts a life cycle assessment (LCA) to evaluate the environmental performance of two major semiconductor packaging types, Lead Frame (LF) and Flip Chip (FC), using gold (Au) or copper (Cu) bonding wires. Carbon footprint (CF) and water scarcity footprint (WSF) are quantified in accordance with ISO 14067 and ISO 14046, respectively, using the ReCiPe and AWARE methods, with a functional unit of 1 mm³. Results indicate that FC-Au wire has the highest CF ( 2.72E-03 kgCO₂eq) and overall environmental impact (2.43E-04 Pt), driven mainly by electricity consumption and upstream raw material production. The same configuration exhibits the highest water use (3.62 E-03 m 3 ), and a WSF evaluated at 2.49 E-03 m 3 world-eq. Incorporating regional water scarcity data reduces WSF values by up to 71.19%, noting the importance of spatial resolution. An alternative assessment with a FU of one piece confirms this trend. Cu-based packaging represents a more sustainable alternative to Au-based packaging, exhibiting significantly lower environmental impacts and water scarcity burdens. These results provide actionable insights for material selection and for identifying sustainable manufacturing locations, particularly in regions such as Japan and Malaysia, within the semiconductor industry. • Two impact LCA-based methods were used to assess the environmental impact of semiconductor packaging • LCA results show that material and packaging types strongly affect environmental impacts. • Copper-based lead frame (LF-Cu) packaging offers the lowest carbon and water footprints. • Water scarcity impacts vary up to 20× across regions, stressing site selection.

Cleaner Waste SystemsVol. 13
National Taipei University of Technology (TW), Chulalongkorn University (TH)
Responsible consumption and production, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.