A Comparative SWOT Analysis of Hospital Management Protocols for Radiation Accidents in Türkiye and Japan

Background: The situation in which radiation emerges uncontrollably is referred to as a radiation accident. Radiation accidents constitute emergencies that can have severe impacts on public health. Therefore, it is of critical importance for hospitals providing healthcare services to be adequately prepared for such incidents.Materials and Methods: This study aims to compare the hospital management protocols for radiation accidents in Türkiye and Japan using the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) analysis method. As a country that has experienced a radiation accident, Japan’s post-incident developments are compared with Türkiye’s current situation. The study first examines the radiation safety regulations, healthcare policies, and hospital management strategies of both countries. While Türkiye has established general protocols under the Hospital Disaster and Emergency Plan (HAP) and for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) incidents, Japan has enhanced its crisis management and emergency response systems following the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Within the framework of the SWOT analysis, the strengths and weaknesses of both countries, potential threats, and opportunities for improvement are analyzed in detail.Results and Discussion: This study highlights how Türkiye can benefit from Japan’s crisis management experience to enhance its preparedness for radiation accidents. The analysis reveals that Türkiye has significant shortcomings, particularly in training, drills, and hospital infrastructure. However, its investments in nuclear energy provide opportunities for development through international collaborations. On the other hand, although Japan possesses advanced radiation monitoring systems and extensive experience, it remains under constant threat due to its high concentration of nuclear power plants and exposure to natural disasters.Conclusion: To prevent radiation accidents, it is recommended to develop a hospital management model based on international standards. Additionally, effective intervention strategies should be formulated through the collaborative decision-making of hospital administrators, healthcare professionals, and policymakers to ensure a comprehensive response to radiation accidents.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
Published
2025-12-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14407/jrpr.2025.00045
Primary Topic
Radioactive contamination and transfer
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative SWOT Analysis of Hospital Management Protocols for Radiation Accidents in Türkiye and Japan

Dilek Kolca
Journal of Radiation Protection and Research
Radioactive contamination and transfer
article

A Comparative SWOT Analysis of Hospital Management Protocols for Radiation Accidents in Türkiye and Japan

Dilek Kolca
article en

Abstract

Background: The situation in which radiation emerges uncontrollably is referred to as a radiation accident. Radiation accidents constitute emergencies that can have severe impacts on public health. Therefore, it is of critical importance for hospitals providing healthcare services to be adequately prepared for such incidents.Materials and Methods: This study aims to compare the hospital management protocols for radiation accidents in Türkiye and Japan using the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats (SWOT) analysis method. As a country that has experienced a radiation accident, Japan’s post-incident developments are compared with Türkiye’s current situation. The study first examines the radiation safety regulations, healthcare policies, and hospital management strategies of both countries. While Türkiye has established general protocols under the Hospital Disaster and Emergency Plan (HAP) and for Chemical, Biological, Radiological, and Nuclear (CBRN) incidents, Japan has enhanced its crisis management and emergency response systems following the 2011 Fukushima Nuclear Accident. Within the framework of the SWOT analysis, the strengths and weaknesses of both countries, potential threats, and opportunities for improvement are analyzed in detail.Results and Discussion: This study highlights how Türkiye can benefit from Japan’s crisis management experience to enhance its preparedness for radiation accidents. The analysis reveals that Türkiye has significant shortcomings, particularly in training, drills, and hospital infrastructure. However, its investments in nuclear energy provide opportunities for development through international collaborations. On the other hand, although Japan possesses advanced radiation monitoring systems and extensive experience, it remains under constant threat due to its high concentration of nuclear power plants and exposure to natural disasters.Conclusion: To prevent radiation accidents, it is recommended to develop a hospital management model based on international standards. Additionally, effective intervention strategies should be formulated through the collaborative decision-making of hospital administrators, healthcare professionals, and policymakers to ensure a comprehensive response to radiation accidents.

Journal of Radiation Protection and ResearchVol. 50(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Radioactive contamination and transfer
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.