Environmental insights from non-target detections in urban eDNA metabarcoding

Metabarcoding amplifies environmental DNA (eDNA) but often yields non-target taxa and false positives. Urban ecosystems are particularly prone to such detections due to inflows of external genetic material, yet their interpretation in urban eDNA studies remains unclear. This study examined non-target occurrences from fish-targeted metabarcoding in inland urban freshwater systems and proposes a perspective on interpreting such detections as ecologically meaningful signals rather than analytical noise. From 32 samples, 27.8% of total reads were non-targets, including 30 species from 21 families of non-target taxa and 35 species from 20 families of marine fish. Non-target taxa were most common in rivers, whereas marine fish appeared near wastewater facilities, reflecting human-derived inputs. These findings highlight that unexpected eDNA detections may reveal overlooked ecological and anthropogenic signals, offering insights for more reliable biodiversity assessment and management in urban ecosystems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
iScience
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2026.114632
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Environmental insights from non-target detections in urban eDNA metabarcoding

Yujin Kang, Youngkeun Song
iScience
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
article

Environmental insights from non-target detections in urban eDNA metabarcoding

Yujin Kang, Youngkeun Song
article en

Abstract

Metabarcoding amplifies environmental DNA (eDNA) but often yields non-target taxa and false positives. Urban ecosystems are particularly prone to such detections due to inflows of external genetic material, yet their interpretation in urban eDNA studies remains unclear. This study examined non-target occurrences from fish-targeted metabarcoding in inland urban freshwater systems and proposes a perspective on interpreting such detections as ecologically meaningful signals rather than analytical noise. From 32 samples, 27.8% of total reads were non-targets, including 30 species from 21 families of non-target taxa and 35 species from 20 families of marine fish. Non-target taxa were most common in rivers, whereas marine fish appeared near wastewater facilities, reflecting human-derived inputs. These findings highlight that unexpected eDNA detections may reveal overlooked ecological and anthropogenic signals, offering insights for more reliable biodiversity assessment and management in urban ecosystems.

iScienceVol. 29(2)
Seoul National University (KR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.