Tau PET load in early‐ and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease: A cross‐sectional and longitudinal comparison of the LEADS and ADNI cohorts

Abstract Background We aimed to assess differences in baseline and longitudinal tau PET tracer binding between early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) in the LEADS and ADNI cohorts, respectively. Method We analyzed amyloid‐beta PET‐positive, cognitively impaired participants from the LEADS (EOAD; n = 383) and ADNI (LOAD; n = 196) cohorts with available 18 F‐Flortaucipir tau PET data (Table 1). A subset had longitudinal 18 F‐Flortaucipir PET data from LEADS ( n = 232) and ADNI ( n = 94) with average follow‐up intervals of 1.95 and 2.44 years, respectively. All 18 F‐Flortaucipir PET scans were processed using the CenTauR pipeline. Cognitively normal participants from LEADS ( n = 94) and ADNI ( n = 421) with baseline 18 F‐Flortaucipir and amyloid‐beta PET scans were also analyzed for comparison. We performed EOAD vs. LOAD comparisons using multivariate linear and linear mixed‐effects models for cross‐sectional and longitudinal analyses, respectively. Result Baseline comparisons revealed large effect‐size, significant differences in 18 F‐Flortaucipir binding between EOAD and LOAD (Figure 1). EOAD participants had higher 18 F‐Flortaucipir levels in widespread neocortical regions compared to LOAD, after adjusting for covariates. In both groups, tau load was negatively associated with age. In EOAD, a significantly steeper slope was found in the association between amyloid‐beta and 18 F‐Flortaucipir load, as well as between cognitive scores and 18 F‐Flortaucipir load. Longitudinally, EOAD participants exhibited a faster increase in 18 F‐Flortaucipir binding than LOAD, predominantly in frontal and occipital areas (Figure 2), with both groups showing an inverse linear relationship between 18 F‐Flortaucipir accumulation rates and age. Conclusion EOAD patients demonstrate significantly higher tau loads, broader neuroanatomical involvement and faster tau accumulation over time compared to LOAD, independent of disease stage. These findings suggest that earlier age‐of‐onset in AD is linked to a more aggressive tauopathy. The early, extensive tau spread in symptomatic EOAD, even at an early clinical stage, may also limit the efficacy of anti‐amyloid‐beta therapies in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_104867
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tau PET load in early‐ and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease: A cross‐sectional and longitudinal comparison of the LEADS and ADNI cohorts

J. Zhang, Ranjani P. Shankar, Renaud La Joie, Daniel R. Schonhaut et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Tau PET load in early‐ and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease: A cross‐sectional and longitudinal comparison of the LEADS and ADNI cohorts

J. Zhang, Ranjani P. Shankar, Renaud La Joie, Daniel R. Schonhaut, Julien Lagarde, Salma Rocha, Dustin B. Hammers, Ganna Blazhenets, Ani Eloyan, Alinda Amuiri, David Soleimani‐Meigooni, Piyush Maiti, M. Carrillo, Brad C. Dickerson, Konstantinos Chiotis, Liana G. Apostolova, Robert A. Koeppe, Gil D. Rabinovici
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background We aimed to assess differences in baseline and longitudinal tau PET tracer binding between early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) in the LEADS and ADNI cohorts, respectively. Method We analyzed amyloid‐beta PET‐positive, cognitively impaired participants from the LEADS (EOAD; n = 383) and ADNI (LOAD; n = 196) cohorts with available 18 F‐Flortaucipir tau PET data (Table 1). A subset had longitudinal 18 F‐Flortaucipir PET data from LEADS ( n = 232) and ADNI ( n = 94) with average follow‐up intervals of 1.95 and 2.44 years, respectively. All 18 F‐Flortaucipir PET scans were processed using the CenTauR pipeline. Cognitively normal participants from LEADS ( n = 94) and ADNI ( n = 421) with baseline 18 F‐Flortaucipir and amyloid‐beta PET scans were also analyzed for comparison. We performed EOAD vs. LOAD comparisons using multivariate linear and linear mixed‐effects models for cross‐sectional and longitudinal analyses, respectively. Result Baseline comparisons revealed large effect‐size, significant differences in 18 F‐Flortaucipir binding between EOAD and LOAD (Figure 1). EOAD participants had higher 18 F‐Flortaucipir levels in widespread neocortical regions compared to LOAD, after adjusting for covariates. In both groups, tau load was negatively associated with age. In EOAD, a significantly steeper slope was found in the association between amyloid‐beta and 18 F‐Flortaucipir load, as well as between cognitive scores and 18 F‐Flortaucipir load. Longitudinally, EOAD participants exhibited a faster increase in 18 F‐Flortaucipir binding than LOAD, predominantly in frontal and occipital areas (Figure 2), with both groups showing an inverse linear relationship between 18 F‐Flortaucipir accumulation rates and age. Conclusion EOAD patients demonstrate significantly higher tau loads, broader neuroanatomical involvement and faster tau accumulation over time compared to LOAD, independent of disease stage. These findings suggest that earlier age‐of‐onset in AD is linked to a more aggressive tauopathy. The early, extensive tau spread in symptomatic EOAD, even at an early clinical stage, may also limit the efficacy of anti‐amyloid‐beta therapies in this population.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Alzheimer's Association (US), Harvard University (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), Brown University (US), University of Michigan (US), University of California System (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), University Memory and Aging Center (US), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.