A Constraint Level Triplicate Closure of the Mott Problem

This paper develops a triplicate, constraint-level closure of the classical Mott problem, reframing wave–track formation as a structural requirement rather than a measurement paradox. Within the ψ₀-OCM framework, particle tracks are shown to arise only when the admissible quantum configurations are restricted by jointly acting constraint layers: symmetry viability, track stability, and localisation admissibility. The closure proceeds in three logically linked stages. First, the constraint formulation recovers the standard quantum description as a limiting regime without invoking ad-hoc collapse rules. Second, boundary-dependent stability conditions identify the regimes in which direction-aligned tracks become physically licensed. Third, the framework remains fully compatible with Schrödinger and Dirac evolution in appropriate limits, interpreting collapse-like behaviour as an admissibility transition rather than a physical discontinuity. The result establishes a single, unified constraint architecture in which track formation, boundary stabilization, and emergent classicality follow as necessary regime properties. The formulation strengthens, rather than replaces, standard theory while remaining independent of any unpublished constructive ψ₀ dynamics. Update Notice — January 2026 This document supersedes the earlier constraint-level treatment of the Mott problem within the ψ₀–OCM. The prior edition outlined the triplicate constraint structure in preliminary form. The present version sets out the finalized constraint architecture for Mott-type behaviour within the ψ₀–OCM and establishes the triplicate closure criterion as the governing condition. It further introduces the formal priority and necessity statements that define equivalence with the ψ₀–OCM at the constraint level. 1. Triplicate Closure Formalization The constraint system is expressed as a rigorously defined triplicate closure criterion, in which symmetry viability, track stability, and localisation admissibility function as interdependent and jointly necessary conditions. 2. Priority and Necessity Statements A formal novelty declaration and necessity clause are included. Any framework asserting parity with, or superiority to, the ψ₀–OCM in treating Mott-type behaviour must demonstrate an equivalent triplicate closure regime. This presentation is limited to the constraint layer. The full technical development of underlying redistribution, detachment, and curvature mechanisms is contained in dedicated ψ₀–OCM internal modules. The earlier paper is formally superseded. This document constitutes the authoritative constraint reference for Mott-type behaviour within the ψ₀–OCM.