The Talking Dead: Voice-Cloning Yourself to AI Afterlife Services.

This article explores AI-driven afterlife services that enable individuals to create voice avatars, allowing interaction with the deceased. Analysing HereAfter, Eternos, and You, Only Virtual, the study explores whether these tools offer users control over their digital afterlife or distort self-representation and assesses their complex effects on grieving processes. The paper highlights ethical and social concerns surrounding voice-based digital immortality. Drawing on media, memory, and death studies, it argues that AI voice deadbots operate as a medium (McLuhan 1964), shaping digital memory and intensifying experiences of connective presence. Through digital ethnography, it examines platform functionalities, user experiences, and media portrayals, showing how AI voice-cloning services construct synthetic self-representation. Grounded in theories of authenticity, self-presentation, and memory (Goffman 1959; van Dijck 2007; Taylor 2022), the study reveals how these hyper-curated avatars foster emotional resonance and perceived trustworthiness, complicating efforts toward AI regulation. This article contributes to ethical debates on AI tools, addressing privacy concerns, commercialisation, and psychological harm in digital death.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Thanatos
Published
2025-12-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.57124/thanatos.160215
Primary Topic
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Talking Dead: Voice-Cloning Yourself to AI Afterlife Services.

Katerina Linden
Thanatos
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
article

The Talking Dead: Voice-Cloning Yourself to AI Afterlife Services.

Katerina Linden
article en

Abstract

This article explores AI-driven afterlife services that enable individuals to create voice avatars, allowing interaction with the deceased. Analysing HereAfter, Eternos, and You, Only Virtual, the study explores whether these tools offer users control over their digital afterlife or distort self-representation and assesses their complex effects on grieving processes. The paper highlights ethical and social concerns surrounding voice-based digital immortality. Drawing on media, memory, and death studies, it argues that AI voice deadbots operate as a medium (McLuhan 1964), shaping digital memory and intensifying experiences of connective presence. Through digital ethnography, it examines platform functionalities, user experiences, and media portrayals, showing how AI voice-cloning services construct synthetic self-representation. Grounded in theories of authenticity, self-presentation, and memory (Goffman 1959; van Dijck 2007; Taylor 2022), the study reveals how these hyper-curated avatars foster emotional resonance and perceived trustworthiness, complicating efforts toward AI regulation. This article contributes to ethical debates on AI tools, addressing privacy concerns, commercialisation, and psychological harm in digital death.

ThanatosVol. 13(2)
Linköping University (SE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.