Greed: A Multilevel Interdisciplinary Review

Greed, one of the oldest social constructs, has been lauded for driving competition and economic ambition that stimulates economic growth and enables technological progress. It has also been ostracized as the root cause of economic inequality, global poverty, and climate change as it prioritizes short-term profits over sustainable, equitable development. While the concept of greed informs a wide range of disciplines, including organizational behavior, psychology, strategic management, marketing, political science, economics, and finance, it lacks construct clarity and a commonly accepted definition. Our bibliometric review of the greed literature reveals that it is characterized by 10 major, loosely connected communities that consider greed at varying levels of analysis. We propose a conceptual definition of greed incorporating acquisitiveness, excess, and harm, which appear across these communities. We categorize research communities based on level of analysis and critically review each community’s core disciplines, treatment of greed, and focal economic, social, and psychological outcomes. Our multilevel framework integrates scholarly work on greed and serves as a basis for future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academy of Management Annals
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2024.0053
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
47.96
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Greed: A Multilevel Interdisciplinary Review

Kurt Norder, Kyle J. Emich, Katalin Takacs-Haynes
1 citations
Academy of Management Annals
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
47.96
article

Greed: A Multilevel Interdisciplinary Review

Kurt Norder, Kyle J. Emich, Katalin Takacs-Haynes
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Greed, one of the oldest social constructs, has been lauded for driving competition and economic ambition that stimulates economic growth and enables technological progress. It has also been ostracized as the root cause of economic inequality, global poverty, and climate change as it prioritizes short-term profits over sustainable, equitable development. While the concept of greed informs a wide range of disciplines, including organizational behavior, psychology, strategic management, marketing, political science, economics, and finance, it lacks construct clarity and a commonly accepted definition. Our bibliometric review of the greed literature reveals that it is characterized by 10 major, loosely connected communities that consider greed at varying levels of analysis. We propose a conceptual definition of greed incorporating acquisitiveness, excess, and harm, which appear across these communities. We categorize research communities based on level of analysis and critically review each community’s core disciplines, treatment of greed, and focal economic, social, and psychological outcomes. Our multilevel framework integrates scholarly work on greed and serves as a basis for future research.

Academy of Management AnnalsVol. 20(1)
University of Delaware (US)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Innovation and Socioeconomic Development
47.96
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.