A Temperature-Corrected High-Frequency Non-Sinusoidal Excitation Core Loss Prediction Model

Predicting core loss under high-frequency non-sinusoidal excitation is crucial for power electronics equipment design. Temperature significantly affects core loss, and traditional core loss prediction models typically incorporate temperature corrections to enable accurate loss estimation across varying temperatures. Based on the Modified Steinmetz Equation (nonT-MSE) model, this study considers the temperature effect by employing a combination of the Tanh function and a linear term to modify the three empirical parameters, with the Tanh function capturing the nonlinear saturation of the loss coefficient k with increasing temperature. This leads to the establishment of the temperature-corrected non-TMSE (T-MSE) model for predicting magnetic core loss under high-frequency non-sinusoidal excitation. During model derivation, training data undergo logarithmic transformation processing. Subsequently, with T-MSE empirical parameters as variables and the minimum mean squared error between T-MSE predicted values and experimental values as the objective function, a single-objective optimization model is established. Finally, the empirical parameters of T-MSE are calculated using the training data and the single-objective optimization model. Comparing the core loss experimental results of the four materials, the average MSE values for the T-MSE model, the nonT-MSE model, and the square-root temperature-corrected non-TMSE model proposed by Zeng et al. (Zeng) are 0.0082, 0.0459, and 0.0110, respectively; with average MAPE of 1.57%, 1.87%, and 2.17%, respectively; and average R2 of 0.9862, 0.9807, and 0.9731. Compared to the nonT-MSE model and the Zeng model, the T-MSE model demonstrated higher prediction accuracy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Magnetochemistry
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/magnetochemistry12010006
Primary Topic
Magnetic Properties and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Temperature-Corrected High-Frequency Non-Sinusoidal Excitation Core Loss Prediction Model

J H Zhang, Yaoji Deng, Jian Chen, Cunhao Lu
Magnetochemistry
Magnetic Properties and Applications
article

A Temperature-Corrected High-Frequency Non-Sinusoidal Excitation Core Loss Prediction Model

J H Zhang, Yaoji Deng, Jian Chen, Cunhao Lu
article en

Abstract

Predicting core loss under high-frequency non-sinusoidal excitation is crucial for power electronics equipment design. Temperature significantly affects core loss, and traditional core loss prediction models typically incorporate temperature corrections to enable accurate loss estimation across varying temperatures. Based on the Modified Steinmetz Equation (nonT-MSE) model, this study considers the temperature effect by employing a combination of the Tanh function and a linear term to modify the three empirical parameters, with the Tanh function capturing the nonlinear saturation of the loss coefficient k with increasing temperature. This leads to the establishment of the temperature-corrected non-TMSE (T-MSE) model for predicting magnetic core loss under high-frequency non-sinusoidal excitation. During model derivation, training data undergo logarithmic transformation processing. Subsequently, with T-MSE empirical parameters as variables and the minimum mean squared error between T-MSE predicted values and experimental values as the objective function, a single-objective optimization model is established. Finally, the empirical parameters of T-MSE are calculated using the training data and the single-objective optimization model. Comparing the core loss experimental results of the four materials, the average MSE values for the T-MSE model, the nonT-MSE model, and the square-root temperature-corrected non-TMSE model proposed by Zeng et al. (Zeng) are 0.0082, 0.0459, and 0.0110, respectively; with average MAPE of 1.57%, 1.87%, and 2.17%, respectively; and average R2 of 0.9862, 0.9807, and 0.9731. Compared to the nonT-MSE model and the Zeng model, the T-MSE model demonstrated higher prediction accuracy.

MagnetochemistryVol. 12(1)
Yangzhou University (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Magnetic Properties and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.