Risk and Reliability Evaluation of Future Industrial Automation Systems: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda

Abstract Today, terms such as sustainable production, industrial cyber-physical systems, cyber-physical production systems (CPPS), software-defined manufacturing, smart manufacturing, Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, system of systems, internet of things, human-in-the-loop, and digital twins are widely used. These concepts emphasize key characteristics of modern and future production systems, including heterogeneity, structural and behavioral complexity, intelligence, autonomy, reconfigurability, and human centrism. They also highlight the growing importance of reliable and up-to-date risk assessment, safety, and reliability measures, given the significant environmental, economic, and social demands. However, current industrial risk analysis methods lag behind the rising technical sophistication of such systems. It remains unclear whether existing methods can capture complex failure scenarios of dynamic, AI-driven systems with advanced software architectures. This paper presents the main challenges faced by safety engineers in industrial automation and provides a structured classification of risk and reliability analysis methods and metrics, supported by a systematic review of 95 papers up to October 2025. The review addresses questions such as: which CPPS aspects must be considered, which methods are applicable, what are their advantages and limitations, and how can methods be combined? The findings reveal the need to extend classical approaches toward dynamic risk assessment, probabilistic model checking, AI-based techniques, digital twins, and intelligent fault injection. The study provides both a comprehensive overview of current risk and reliability assessment methods for CPPS and a roadmap for advancing their future development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical Engineering
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4070764
Primary Topic
Digital Transformation in Industry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk and Reliability Evaluation of Future Industrial Automation Systems: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda

Tagir Fabarisov, Georg Siedel, Stefan Voß, Victor Bolbot et al.
ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical Engineering
Digital Transformation in Industry
article

Risk and Reliability Evaluation of Future Industrial Automation Systems: A Systematic Literature Review and Research Agenda

Tagir Fabarisov, Georg Siedel, Stefan Voß, Victor Bolbot, Silvia Vock, Andrey Morozov
article en

Abstract

Abstract Today, terms such as sustainable production, industrial cyber-physical systems, cyber-physical production systems (CPPS), software-defined manufacturing, smart manufacturing, Industry 4.0, Industry 5.0, system of systems, internet of things, human-in-the-loop, and digital twins are widely used. These concepts emphasize key characteristics of modern and future production systems, including heterogeneity, structural and behavioral complexity, intelligence, autonomy, reconfigurability, and human centrism. They also highlight the growing importance of reliable and up-to-date risk assessment, safety, and reliability measures, given the significant environmental, economic, and social demands. However, current industrial risk analysis methods lag behind the rising technical sophistication of such systems. It remains unclear whether existing methods can capture complex failure scenarios of dynamic, AI-driven systems with advanced software architectures. This paper presents the main challenges faced by safety engineers in industrial automation and provides a structured classification of risk and reliability analysis methods and metrics, supported by a systematic review of 95 papers up to October 2025. The review addresses questions such as: which CPPS aspects must be considered, which methods are applicable, what are their advantages and limitations, and how can methods be combined? The findings reveal the need to extend classical approaches toward dynamic risk assessment, probabilistic model checking, AI-based techniques, digital twins, and intelligent fault injection. The study provides both a comprehensive overview of current risk and reliability assessment methods for CPPS and a roadmap for advancing their future development.

ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B Mechanical EngineeringVol. 12(2)
University of Stuttgart (DE), Novia University of Applied Sciences (FI), University of Luxembourg (LU), Workplace Health, Safety and Compensation Commission (CA), Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (DE), Aalto University (FI)
Bundesanstalt für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Digital Transformation in Industry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.