Ecological farm typology and comparison in China: An unsupervised machine learning approach

Promoting ecological farms is a critical initiative for greening agriculture and advancing eco-agricultural theory into practice. Although China integrated ecological farm construction into national plans post-2020, its development remains nascent, necessitating objective and quantitative methods to classify farm models and evaluate their performance. This study addresses this gap by applying unsupervised machine learning—specifically Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) clustering—to 2022 declaration data from 678 national ecological farms. Our analysis identified three distinct typologies: National Varieties Fine Management Type (NVFMT, 40.27 %), characterized by small-scale, specialty-crop operations with minimal synthetic inputs; Diversified Business Type (DBT, 33.78 %), integrating vegetable production, agritourism, and high adoption of eco-measures; and Large-scale Traditional Type (LTT, 25.96 %), focused on grain cultivation with extensive land use and flood irrigation. Performance evaluation using life cycle assessment, total factor productivity (TFP), and revenue analysis revealed no significant economic differences across types. However, NVFMT and DBT exhibited 48–52 % lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity than LTT, attributable to reduced fertilizer use and diversified practices. DBT also achieved significantly higher TFP (1.18) compared to NVFMT (0.68) and LTT (0.72), linked to operational diversity and technological integration. As the first national-scale application of machine learning to ecological farm typology in China, this research provides an evidence-based framework to guide targeted policies for sustainable agricultural transformation. • Classify ecological farms using unsupervised machine learning methods. • Use 678 selection data of national-level ecological farms in China. • Ecological farms were divided into 3 clusters according to 38 feature indicators. • A comparative analysis was conducted on GHG emissions, productivity, and revenue.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.114560
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ecological farm typology and comparison in China: An unsupervised machine learning approach

Linxiu Zhang, Xiangbo Xu, Yinghao Xue, Shuang Liu et al.
Ecological Indicators
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Ecological farm typology and comparison in China: An unsupervised machine learning approach

Linxiu Zhang, Xiangbo Xu, Yinghao Xue, Shuang Liu, Ziyi Zhou, Xiaofang Hu, Zhiyu Xu, Xiaohua Yu, Yue Xu
article en

Abstract

Promoting ecological farms is a critical initiative for greening agriculture and advancing eco-agricultural theory into practice. Although China integrated ecological farm construction into national plans post-2020, its development remains nascent, necessitating objective and quantitative methods to classify farm models and evaluate their performance. This study addresses this gap by applying unsupervised machine learning—specifically Partitioning Around Medoids (PAM) clustering—to 2022 declaration data from 678 national ecological farms. Our analysis identified three distinct typologies: National Varieties Fine Management Type (NVFMT, 40.27 %), characterized by small-scale, specialty-crop operations with minimal synthetic inputs; Diversified Business Type (DBT, 33.78 %), integrating vegetable production, agritourism, and high adoption of eco-measures; and Large-scale Traditional Type (LTT, 25.96 %), focused on grain cultivation with extensive land use and flood irrigation. Performance evaluation using life cycle assessment, total factor productivity (TFP), and revenue analysis revealed no significant economic differences across types. However, NVFMT and DBT exhibited 48–52 % lower greenhouse gas (GHG) emission intensity than LTT, attributable to reduced fertilizer use and diversified practices. DBT also achieved significantly higher TFP (1.18) compared to NVFMT (0.68) and LTT (0.72), linked to operational diversity and technological integration. As the first national-scale application of machine learning to ecological farm typology in China, this research provides an evidence-based framework to guide targeted policies for sustainable agricultural transformation. • Classify ecological farms using unsupervised machine learning methods. • Use 678 selection data of national-level ecological farms in China. • Ecological farms were divided into 3 clusters according to 38 feature indicators. • A comparative analysis was conducted on GHG emissions, productivity, and revenue.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 182
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), United Nations Environment Programme (KE), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), University of Göttingen (DE)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.