Implementing proximity planning under constraint: The case of Kiezblocks in Berlin

• A real-world application of the Superblock model in a German context. • Empirical analysis based on participatory planning workshops and administrative collaboration. • A critical reflection on spatial legitimacy, procedural design, and urban governance. • Integration of citizen input and traffic diagnostics to meet legal requirements for traffic calming. • Comparative insights from London and Barcelona highlight proximity planning as a contested field. This article investigates the implementation of proximity-oriented mobility planning through the lens of the Kiezblock initiative in Berlin. Drawing on empirical data from participatory workshops, spatial conflict mapping, and administrative procedures, the study analyzes how local authorities translate citizen input and observational data into actionable traffic calming interventions modelled after the Superblock approach. The Berlin case exemplifies how participatory planning gains traction when embedded in institutional frameworks and complemented by legal justification strategies under the German Road Traffic Regulations. The findings reveal a hybrid planning logic that combines civic co-production with evidence-based validation to address the structural constraints of German mobility governance. Comparative insights from London and Barcelona further contextualize the Kiezblock experience, highlighting four key dimensions of contestation: procedural legitimacy, social equity, institutional embedding, and symbolic scale. Across all cases, proximity planning emerges not as a technocratic optimization tool, but as a politically contested process shaped by competing imaginaries, administrative limitations, and divergent stakeholder interests. The article concludes that successful proximity planning requires not only spatial and participatory innovation, but also adaptive governance frameworks capable of navigating institutional inertia and managing urban conflict. By triangulating citizen knowledge with observational evidence, the Kiezblock experience highlights transferable governance principles that may inform proximity planning in other contexts facing similar regulatory and institutional constraints.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Urban Mobility
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urbmob.2026.100183
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementing proximity planning under constraint: The case of Kiezblocks in Berlin

Alexander Rammert, Sven Hausigke
Journal of Urban Mobility
Urban Planning and Governance
article

Implementing proximity planning under constraint: The case of Kiezblocks in Berlin

Alexander Rammert, Sven Hausigke
article en

Abstract

• A real-world application of the Superblock model in a German context. • Empirical analysis based on participatory planning workshops and administrative collaboration. • A critical reflection on spatial legitimacy, procedural design, and urban governance. • Integration of citizen input and traffic diagnostics to meet legal requirements for traffic calming. • Comparative insights from London and Barcelona highlight proximity planning as a contested field. This article investigates the implementation of proximity-oriented mobility planning through the lens of the Kiezblock initiative in Berlin. Drawing on empirical data from participatory workshops, spatial conflict mapping, and administrative procedures, the study analyzes how local authorities translate citizen input and observational data into actionable traffic calming interventions modelled after the Superblock approach. The Berlin case exemplifies how participatory planning gains traction when embedded in institutional frameworks and complemented by legal justification strategies under the German Road Traffic Regulations. The findings reveal a hybrid planning logic that combines civic co-production with evidence-based validation to address the structural constraints of German mobility governance. Comparative insights from London and Barcelona further contextualize the Kiezblock experience, highlighting four key dimensions of contestation: procedural legitimacy, social equity, institutional embedding, and symbolic scale. Across all cases, proximity planning emerges not as a technocratic optimization tool, but as a politically contested process shaped by competing imaginaries, administrative limitations, and divergent stakeholder interests. The article concludes that successful proximity planning requires not only spatial and participatory innovation, but also adaptive governance frameworks capable of navigating institutional inertia and managing urban conflict. By triangulating citizen knowledge with observational evidence, the Kiezblock experience highlights transferable governance principles that may inform proximity planning in other contexts facing similar regulatory and institutional constraints.

Journal of Urban MobilityVol. 9
Stratec (Germany) (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.