Biomarker confirmed reference values for acoustic voice features: findings from the Framingham Heart Study

Abstract Background Interest in acoustic voice features as digital biomarkers of underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been increasing. However, lacking confirmation of AD specificity and reference values or normative information, particularly in relation to AD‐specific biomarkers, greatly limits the ability to determine measurement thresholds that are clinically meaningful. We present preliminary normative values of acoustic voice features for those who are positron emission tomography (PET) beta amyloid positive (Aß+) and negative (Aß‐). Method This study included 268 cognitively unimpaired participants (mean age 57.2 ± 9.9 years; 50.4% female) from the Framingham Heart Study Brain Aging Program who had voice recordings of neuropsychological assessment obtained within one year before amyloid PET imaging. Sixty‐five acoustic features (i.e., prosodic, spectral, and sound quality voice features) were extracted from recordings during the Wechsler Memory Scale Logical Memory Delayed recall tests using open‐source Speech and Music Interpretation by Large‐space Extraction (OpenSMILE). Reference values were established at the 2.5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 97.5th percentiles for each acoustic feature within the entire sample, amyloid‐positive (Aß+) and amyloid‐negative (Aß‐) groups. Differences between the Aß+ and Aß‐ groups were evaluated using Mann‐Whitney U tests. Result Of the 268 participants, 30 (11%) were Aß+. Reference values for all 65 acoustic features were established across all percentile thresholds within the whole sample, the Aß+ and Aß‐ groups (see Table). Four acoustic features differed between the Aß+ and Aß‐ groups: voicingFinalUnclipped ( P = 0.03), pcm_fftMag_spectralKurtosis ( P = 0.04), MFCC[5] ( P = 0.02), and MFCC[10] ( P = 0.03). Three of them have higher median values in Aß+ group. As a sound quality measure, VoicingFinalUnclipped indicates the voicing probability of the final fundamental frequency candidate without zero‐clipping. The pcm_fftMag_spectralKurtosis represents magnitude of spectral kurtosis. MFCCs reflect the power spectrum of a sound and are mathematical representations of essential human speech characteristics. Conclusion These results suggest acoustic features may be an effective marker for preclinical AD screening of older adults who are Aß+. Future studies should stratify based on biomarker status to refine reference values and expand doing so with more diverse populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/alz70856_104922
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biomarker confirmed reference values for acoustic voice features: findings from the Framingham Heart Study

Preeti Sunderaraman, Rhoda Au, Ashita S. Gurnani, Cody Karjadi et al.
Alzheimer s & Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Biomarker confirmed reference values for acoustic voice features: findings from the Framingham Heart Study

Preeti Sunderaraman, Rhoda Au, Ashita S. Gurnani, Cody Karjadi, Huitong Ding, Elizabeth C. Mormino, Christina B. Young, Xavier Serrano, Katherine A. Gifford
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Interest in acoustic voice features as digital biomarkers of underlying Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been increasing. However, lacking confirmation of AD specificity and reference values or normative information, particularly in relation to AD‐specific biomarkers, greatly limits the ability to determine measurement thresholds that are clinically meaningful. We present preliminary normative values of acoustic voice features for those who are positron emission tomography (PET) beta amyloid positive (Aß+) and negative (Aß‐). Method This study included 268 cognitively unimpaired participants (mean age 57.2 ± 9.9 years; 50.4% female) from the Framingham Heart Study Brain Aging Program who had voice recordings of neuropsychological assessment obtained within one year before amyloid PET imaging. Sixty‐five acoustic features (i.e., prosodic, spectral, and sound quality voice features) were extracted from recordings during the Wechsler Memory Scale Logical Memory Delayed recall tests using open‐source Speech and Music Interpretation by Large‐space Extraction (OpenSMILE). Reference values were established at the 2.5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 97.5th percentiles for each acoustic feature within the entire sample, amyloid‐positive (Aß+) and amyloid‐negative (Aß‐) groups. Differences between the Aß+ and Aß‐ groups were evaluated using Mann‐Whitney U tests. Result Of the 268 participants, 30 (11%) were Aß+. Reference values for all 65 acoustic features were established across all percentile thresholds within the whole sample, the Aß+ and Aß‐ groups (see Table). Four acoustic features differed between the Aß+ and Aß‐ groups: voicingFinalUnclipped ( P = 0.03), pcm_fftMag_spectralKurtosis ( P = 0.04), MFCC[5] ( P = 0.02), and MFCC[10] ( P = 0.03). Three of them have higher median values in Aß+ group. As a sound quality measure, VoicingFinalUnclipped indicates the voicing probability of the final fundamental frequency candidate without zero‐clipping. The pcm_fftMag_spectralKurtosis represents magnitude of spectral kurtosis. MFCCs reflect the power spectrum of a sound and are mathematical representations of essential human speech characteristics. Conclusion These results suggest acoustic features may be an effective marker for preclinical AD screening of older adults who are Aß+. Future studies should stratify based on biomarker status to refine reference values and expand doing so with more diverse populations.

Alzheimer s & DementiaVol. 21(S2)
Boston University (US), Stanford University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.