Is this real? Susceptibility to deepfakes in machines and humans

Deepfakes are synthetic media created by deep-generative methods to fake a person's audio-visual representation. Growing sophistication of deepfake technology poses significant challenges for both machine learning (ML) algorithms and humans. Here we used real and deepfake static face images (Study 1) and dynamic videos (Study 2) to (i) investigate sources of misclassification errors in machines, (ii) identify psychological mechanisms underlying detection performance in humans, and (iii) compare humans and machines in their classification decision accuracy and confidence. Study 1 found that machines achieved excellent performance in classifying real and deepfake images, with good accuracy in feature classification. Humans, in contrast, experienced challenges in distinguishing between real and deepfake static images. Their classification accuracy was at chance level, and this underperformance relative to machines was accompanied by a truth bias and low confidence for the detection of deepfake images. Using dynamic video stimuli, Study 2 found that performance of machines was near chance level, with poor feature classification. Further, machines showed greater lie bias and reduced decision confidence relative to humans who outperformed machines in the detection of video deepfakes. Finally, Study 2 revealed that higher analytical thinking, lower positive affect, and greater internet skills were associated with better video deepfake detection in humans. Combined, the findings across these two studies advance understanding of factors contributing to deepfake detection in both machines and humans; and can inform intervention toward tackling the growing threat from deepfakes by identifying areas of particular benefit from human-AI collaboration to optimize the detection of deepfakes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-025-00700-y
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
46.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is this real? Susceptibility to deepfakes in machines and humans

Brian S. Cahill, Didem Pehlivanoglu, Mengdi Zhu, Aude Anne Colette Madeleine Gagnon-Roberge et al.
1 citations
Cognitive Research Principles and Implications
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
46.84
article

Is this real? Susceptibility to deepfakes in machines and humans

Brian S. Cahill, Didem Pehlivanoglu, Mengdi Zhu, Aude Anne Colette Madeleine Gagnon-Roberge, Rebecca Kern, Jialong Zhen, Natalie C. Ebner, Damon Woodard
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Deepfakes are synthetic media created by deep-generative methods to fake a person's audio-visual representation. Growing sophistication of deepfake technology poses significant challenges for both machine learning (ML) algorithms and humans. Here we used real and deepfake static face images (Study 1) and dynamic videos (Study 2) to (i) investigate sources of misclassification errors in machines, (ii) identify psychological mechanisms underlying detection performance in humans, and (iii) compare humans and machines in their classification decision accuracy and confidence. Study 1 found that machines achieved excellent performance in classifying real and deepfake images, with good accuracy in feature classification. Humans, in contrast, experienced challenges in distinguishing between real and deepfake static images. Their classification accuracy was at chance level, and this underperformance relative to machines was accompanied by a truth bias and low confidence for the detection of deepfake images. Using dynamic video stimuli, Study 2 found that performance of machines was near chance level, with poor feature classification. Further, machines showed greater lie bias and reduced decision confidence relative to humans who outperformed machines in the detection of video deepfakes. Finally, Study 2 revealed that higher analytical thinking, lower positive affect, and greater internet skills were associated with better video deepfake detection in humans. Combined, the findings across these two studies advance understanding of factors contributing to deepfake detection in both machines and humans; and can inform intervention toward tackling the growing threat from deepfakes by identifying areas of particular benefit from human-AI collaboration to optimize the detection of deepfakes.

Cognitive Research Principles and ImplicationsVol. 11(1)
University of Florida (US)
Brain Research Foundation, McKnight Foundation, Florida Department of Health, Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Research Foundation, National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
46.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.