Differential neural responses to rhythmic and patterned TMS protocols: Insights from EEG spectral analysis

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) engages brain networks for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), using either rhythmic (e.g., 10 Hz) or patterned (e.g., intermittent Theta Burst, or iTBS) stimulation protocols. The distinct effects of these protocols on brain function are not well understood. Sixteen subjects with MDD underwent a TMS-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) "interrogation" paradigm, in which a broad range of rhythmic and patterned stimulation frequencies were administered in a randomized order to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC). rTMS-induced changes in oscillatory activity and effective connectivity to the DLPFC were examined at each frequency. Linear mixed-effects models revealed widespread changes in power and connectivity, with magnitude and regional distribution of change dependent upon both protocol and frequency of stimulation. Increases in beta band power were most prominent with patterned stimulation, while rhythmic stimulation increased both alpha and beta power at stimulation frequencies greater than 7 Hz (p < 0.05). Source localization showed that patterned and rhythmic stimulation elicited activation in distinct subregions of the cingulate. Rhythmic and patterned stimulation also had distinct effects on connectivity: notably, only rhythmic stimulation increased connectivity with regions near the stimulation site, while only patterned stimulation decreased connectivity to the left precuneus. Both protocols increased the effective connectivity to the orbitofrontal cortex in the theta and beta response bands (p < 0.05). These results indicate that rhythmic and patterned rTMS engage distinct brain regions in a protocol- and frequency-dependent manner. Future studies should examine how these mechanistic differences may relate to clinical outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuropsychopharmacology
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41386-025-02306-w
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential neural responses to rhythmic and patterned TMS protocols: Insights from EEG spectral analysis

David E. Krantz, Margaret G. Distler, Ralph J. Koek, Hewa Artin et al.
Neuropsychopharmacology
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Differential neural responses to rhythmic and patterned TMS protocols: Insights from EEG spectral analysis

David E. Krantz, Margaret G. Distler, Ralph J. Koek, Hewa Artin, Cole Matthews, Evan Hy Einstein, Dustin Z. DeYoung, Andrew F. Leuchter, Hanadi Ajam Oughli, Scott A. Wilke, Michael K. Leuchter, Mohamad Shamas, Juliana Corlier, Thomas B. Strouse, Nathaniel D. Ginder, Aaron Slan, Thomas Valles, Hrag Peltekian, Doan Ngo, Reza Tadayonnejad, Hope Hawkins, Alexander S. Young
article en

Abstract

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) engages brain networks for the treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), using either rhythmic (e.g., 10 Hz) or patterned (e.g., intermittent Theta Burst, or iTBS) stimulation protocols. The distinct effects of these protocols on brain function are not well understood. Sixteen subjects with MDD underwent a TMS-electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) "interrogation" paradigm, in which a broad range of rhythmic and patterned stimulation frequencies were administered in a randomized order to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (L-DLPFC). rTMS-induced changes in oscillatory activity and effective connectivity to the DLPFC were examined at each frequency. Linear mixed-effects models revealed widespread changes in power and connectivity, with magnitude and regional distribution of change dependent upon both protocol and frequency of stimulation. Increases in beta band power were most prominent with patterned stimulation, while rhythmic stimulation increased both alpha and beta power at stimulation frequencies greater than 7 Hz (p < 0.05). Source localization showed that patterned and rhythmic stimulation elicited activation in distinct subregions of the cingulate. Rhythmic and patterned stimulation also had distinct effects on connectivity: notably, only rhythmic stimulation increased connectivity with regions near the stimulation site, while only patterned stimulation decreased connectivity to the left precuneus. Both protocols increased the effective connectivity to the orbitofrontal cortex in the theta and beta response bands (p < 0.05). These results indicate that rhythmic and patterned rTMS engage distinct brain regions in a protocol- and frequency-dependent manner. Future studies should examine how these mechanistic differences may relate to clinical outcomes.

NeuropsychopharmacologyVol. 51(5)
California Institute of Technology (US), UCLA Medical Center (US), Neurobehavioral Systems (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.