Spectral Similarity Masks Structural Diversity at Hydrophobic Water Interfaces

The air-water and graphene-water interfaces represent quintessential examples of the liquid-gas and liquid-solid boundaries, respectively. While the sum-frequency generation (SFG) spectra of these interfaces show similarities, a consensus on their signals and interpretations has yet to be reached. Leveraging deep learning, we computed first-principles SFG spectra for both systems, addressing experimental discrepancies. Our findings reveal that similarities in SFG signals do not translate into comparable interfacial microscopic properties. Instead, graphene-water and air-water interfaces exhibit fundamental differences in SFG-active thicknesses, hydrogen-bonding networks, and surface dynamics. These distinctions underscore roughness suppression and electronic interactions present at the solid-liquid interface but absent at the gas-liquid interface.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physical Review Letters
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/w27h-sclq
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
31.39
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spectral Similarity Masks Structural Diversity at Hydrophobic Water Interfaces

Lorenzo Agosta, Roberto Car, Linhan Du, Y. Q. Li et al.
1 citations
Physical Review Letters
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
31.39
article

Spectral Similarity Masks Structural Diversity at Hydrophobic Water Interfaces

Lorenzo Agosta, Roberto Car, Linhan Du, Y. Q. Li, Mariza de Andrade, Chunyi Zhang, A. Selloni, Anonymous
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The air-water and graphene-water interfaces represent quintessential examples of the liquid-gas and liquid-solid boundaries, respectively. While the sum-frequency generation (SFG) spectra of these interfaces show similarities, a consensus on their signals and interpretations has yet to be reached. Leveraging deep learning, we computed first-principles SFG spectra for both systems, addressing experimental discrepancies. Our findings reveal that similarities in SFG signals do not translate into comparable interfacial microscopic properties. Instead, graphene-water and air-water interfaces exhibit fundamental differences in SFG-active thicknesses, hydrogen-bonding networks, and surface dynamics. These distinctions underscore roughness suppression and electronic interactions present at the solid-liquid interface but absent at the gas-liquid interface.

Physical Review LettersVol. 136(5)
Uppsala University (SE), Eastern Institute of Technology (NZ), Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), Princeton University (US), University of California System (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Spectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
31.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.