Interruptibility of software developers and its prediction using psycho-physiological sensors: a replication

Abstract Background Interruptions at inopportune moments can negatively affect the perceived productivity of software developers. Previous research has attempted to predict the interruptibility of software developers using biophysical data to minimize interruptions at such moments. Aims First, we sought to replicate the results of a well-known study that predicted the interruptibility of software developers with high accuracy in lab and field settings. Second, we provide a comprehensive and publicly available lab package to facilitate future replications. Method We conducted an external close replication of the original lab study. As such, we held ten one-on-one sessions in which participants were asked to perform three code change tasks during a 60-minute programming session while frequently interrupted by a tablet application and monitored by selected biometric sensors. The biophysical data were used to derive predictive (classification) models. Results We cannot replicate models that significantly improve over the baseline of a majority classifier. Furthermore, we identify three severe threats to validity: a small sample size, a highly imbalanced dataset, and an ad hoc transformation of a critical measurement scale. Conclusions The original results did not generalize to our more varied setting (e.g., participant profile). We recommend only conceptually replicating the original study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Empirical Software Engineering
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-025-10739-6
Primary Topic
Software Engineering Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interruptibility of software developers and its prediction using psycho-physiological sensors: a replication

Stefan Sobernig, Florian Poreba
Empirical Software Engineering
Software Engineering Research
article

Interruptibility of software developers and its prediction using psycho-physiological sensors: a replication

Stefan Sobernig, Florian Poreba
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Interruptions at inopportune moments can negatively affect the perceived productivity of software developers. Previous research has attempted to predict the interruptibility of software developers using biophysical data to minimize interruptions at such moments. Aims First, we sought to replicate the results of a well-known study that predicted the interruptibility of software developers with high accuracy in lab and field settings. Second, we provide a comprehensive and publicly available lab package to facilitate future replications. Method We conducted an external close replication of the original lab study. As such, we held ten one-on-one sessions in which participants were asked to perform three code change tasks during a 60-minute programming session while frequently interrupted by a tablet application and monitored by selected biometric sensors. The biophysical data were used to derive predictive (classification) models. Results We cannot replicate models that significantly improve over the baseline of a majority classifier. Furthermore, we identify three severe threats to validity: a small sample size, a highly imbalanced dataset, and an ad hoc transformation of a critical measurement scale. Conclusions The original results did not generalize to our more varied setting (e.g., participant profile). We recommend only conceptually replicating the original study.

Empirical Software EngineeringVol. 31(3)
Vienna University of Economics and Business (AT)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Software Engineering Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.