Predictive Biomarkers for Asymptomatic Adults: Opportunities, Risks, and Guidance for General Practice

Biomarker-based prevention is rapidly expanding, driven by advances in molecular diagnostics, genetic profiling, and commercial direct-to-consumer (DTC) testing. General practitioners (GPs) increasingly encounter biomarker results of uncertain relevance, often introduced outside the guideline frameworks. This creates new challenges in interpretation, communication, and equitable resource use in primary care. This narrative review synthesizes evidence from population-based studies, guideline frameworks, consensus statements, and communication research to evaluate the predictive value, limitations, and real-world implications of biomarkers in asymptomatic adults. Attention is given to polygenic risk scores, DTC genetic tests, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular biomarkers, and emerging multi-omics and aging markers. Several biomarkers, including high-sensitivity cardiac troponins, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, lipoprotein(a), coronary artery calcium scoring, and plasma p-tau species, showed robust predictive validity. However, many widely marketed biomarkers lack evidence of clinical utility, offer limited actionable benefits, or perform poorly in primary care populations. Unintended consequences, such as overdiagnosis, false positives, psychological distress, diagnostic cascades, and widening inequities, are well documented. Patients often misinterpret unvalidated biomarker results, whereas DTC testing amplifies demand without providing adequate counseling or follow-up. Only a minority of biomarkers currently meet the thresholds of analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility required for preventive use in general practices. GPs play a critical role in contextualizing biomarker results, guiding shared decision-making, and mitigating potential harm. The responsible integration of biomarkers into preventive medicine requires clear communication, strong ethical safeguards, robust evidence, and system-level support for equitable, patient-centered care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020196
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
30.07
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predictive Biomarkers for Asymptomatic Adults: Opportunities, Risks, and Guidance for General Practice

Giuliano Piccoliori, Adolf Engl, Christian J. Wiedermann, Doris Hager von Strobele-Prainsack
1 citations
Diagnostics
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
30.07
article

Predictive Biomarkers for Asymptomatic Adults: Opportunities, Risks, and Guidance for General Practice

Giuliano Piccoliori, Adolf Engl, Christian J. Wiedermann, Doris Hager von Strobele-Prainsack
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Biomarker-based prevention is rapidly expanding, driven by advances in molecular diagnostics, genetic profiling, and commercial direct-to-consumer (DTC) testing. General practitioners (GPs) increasingly encounter biomarker results of uncertain relevance, often introduced outside the guideline frameworks. This creates new challenges in interpretation, communication, and equitable resource use in primary care. This narrative review synthesizes evidence from population-based studies, guideline frameworks, consensus statements, and communication research to evaluate the predictive value, limitations, and real-world implications of biomarkers in asymptomatic adults. Attention is given to polygenic risk scores, DTC genetic tests, neurodegenerative and cardiovascular biomarkers, and emerging multi-omics and aging markers. Several biomarkers, including high-sensitivity cardiac troponins, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, lipoprotein(a), coronary artery calcium scoring, and plasma p-tau species, showed robust predictive validity. However, many widely marketed biomarkers lack evidence of clinical utility, offer limited actionable benefits, or perform poorly in primary care populations. Unintended consequences, such as overdiagnosis, false positives, psychological distress, diagnostic cascades, and widening inequities, are well documented. Patients often misinterpret unvalidated biomarker results, whereas DTC testing amplifies demand without providing adequate counseling or follow-up. Only a minority of biomarkers currently meet the thresholds of analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility required for preventive use in general practices. GPs play a critical role in contextualizing biomarker results, guiding shared decision-making, and mitigating potential harm. The responsible integration of biomarkers into preventive medicine requires clear communication, strong ethical safeguards, robust evidence, and system-level support for equitable, patient-centered care.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
30.07
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.