Paper vs. screen: inclination matters during global–local visual processing

The use of new technologies has opened the field to numerous studies regarding their impact on cognition. While many studies have suggested that paper presents an advantage over screens, the impact of the medium during local-global visual attentional processes has never been investigated. Visual processing is indeed characterized by a global advantage (i.e., faster global than local processing) and by global interference (i.e., interference from global information during local processing). We designed a task to assess whether global-local processing could be modulated by the type of medium. Owing to the frequent variations in paper and screen presentations encountered in daily life, we also studied differences in inclination between screen and paper. The results revealed an interaction between inclination and global-local processes. Global interference was more pronounced when the medium was tilted, whereas similar global and local interference effects were observed when the medium was flat. There was no effect of the medium <i>per se</i>. Taken together, these results suggest no evidence of an impact of medium during local-global visual processing but rather suggest an impact of the inclination. This factor is discussed and should be considered in future studies on topics regarding the impact of the digital environment on humans.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1701298
Primary Topic
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Paper vs. screen: inclination matters during global–local visual processing

Nicolas Poirel, Paul Nibaudeau
Frontiers in Psychology
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
article

Paper vs. screen: inclination matters during global–local visual processing

Nicolas Poirel, Paul Nibaudeau
article en

Abstract

The use of new technologies has opened the field to numerous studies regarding their impact on cognition. While many studies have suggested that paper presents an advantage over screens, the impact of the medium during local-global visual attentional processes has never been investigated. Visual processing is indeed characterized by a global advantage (i.e., faster global than local processing) and by global interference (i.e., interference from global information during local processing). We designed a task to assess whether global-local processing could be modulated by the type of medium. Owing to the frequent variations in paper and screen presentations encountered in daily life, we also studied differences in inclination between screen and paper. The results revealed an interaction between inclination and global-local processes. Global interference was more pronounced when the medium was tilted, whereas similar global and local interference effects were observed when the medium was flat. There was no effect of the medium <i>per se</i>. Taken together, these results suggest no evidence of an impact of medium during local-global visual processing but rather suggest an impact of the inclination. This factor is discussed and should be considered in future studies on topics regarding the impact of the digital environment on humans.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 16
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Institut Universitaire de France (FR), Université Paris Cité (FR), Sorbonne Paris Cité (FR), Laboratoire de Psychologie du Développement et de L’Education de l’enfant (FR), Cyceron (FR)
Association Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Paper vs. screen: inclination matters during global–local visual processing — Nicolas Poirel, Paul Nibaudeau · Frontiers in Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS