Are poverty-targeting tools practicable? Insights from Khmer communities in Southern Vietnam

Abstract Poverty-targeting tools (PTTs) are widely used to identify households below specific poverty thresholds using supposedly practical indicators. While their accuracy has been extensively studied, their practicability—defined as simplicity and verifiability in real-world contexts—remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap and ensures the practicability of Ethnic Minority Poverty-Targeting tools (EMP tools), originally developed under laboratory conditions, by evaluating these tools’ practicability within Khmer communities in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Quantitatively, we assess tools’ practicability from poverty-targeting enumerators’ perspectives through Likert scales, and apply Factor Analysis and Ordinary Least Squares regressions to identify practicability determinants. Thematic analysis of qualitative data explores how enumerators obtain and verify indicators. Findings show that while EMP tools are generally perceived as practical—with over half of enumerators affirming the straightforwardness and verifiability of most indicators—significant variations exist. Indicators typically considered practical, such as cellphone ownership and job types, receive the lowest scores for verifiability. Conversely, the land ownership indicator, often considered complex, shows higher practicability. Local knowledge, especially from village leaders, plays an important role in verifying high-risk misreporting indicators, while village meetings are ineffective. Enumerator characteristics (ethnicity, gender, age, and experience) significantly determine of tools’ practicability. This study contributes insights into PTT practicability and presents a methodological framework for pre-assessing PTT practicability before deployment. Findings underscore the need to assess indicator applicability across contexts, as conventional assumptions may not always hold. Identified determinants can aid local governments in selecting appropriate enumerators to maximize tool effectiveness in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quality & Quantity
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-025-02541-9
Primary Topic
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are poverty-targeting tools practicable? Insights from Khmer communities in Southern Vietnam

Orkhan Sariyev, Be Thanh Duong, Manfred Zeller
Quality & Quantity
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
article

Are poverty-targeting tools practicable? Insights from Khmer communities in Southern Vietnam

Orkhan Sariyev, Be Thanh Duong, Manfred Zeller
article en

Abstract

Abstract Poverty-targeting tools (PTTs) are widely used to identify households below specific poverty thresholds using supposedly practical indicators. While their accuracy has been extensively studied, their practicability—defined as simplicity and verifiability in real-world contexts—remains underexplored. This study addresses this gap and ensures the practicability of Ethnic Minority Poverty-Targeting tools (EMP tools), originally developed under laboratory conditions, by evaluating these tools’ practicability within Khmer communities in the Vietnamese Mekong Delta. Quantitatively, we assess tools’ practicability from poverty-targeting enumerators’ perspectives through Likert scales, and apply Factor Analysis and Ordinary Least Squares regressions to identify practicability determinants. Thematic analysis of qualitative data explores how enumerators obtain and verify indicators. Findings show that while EMP tools are generally perceived as practical—with over half of enumerators affirming the straightforwardness and verifiability of most indicators—significant variations exist. Indicators typically considered practical, such as cellphone ownership and job types, receive the lowest scores for verifiability. Conversely, the land ownership indicator, often considered complex, shows higher practicability. Local knowledge, especially from village leaders, plays an important role in verifying high-risk misreporting indicators, while village meetings are ineffective. Enumerator characteristics (ethnicity, gender, age, and experience) significantly determine of tools’ practicability. This study contributes insights into PTT practicability and presents a methodological framework for pre-assessing PTT practicability before deployment. Findings underscore the need to assess indicator applicability across contexts, as conventional assumptions may not always hold. Identified determinants can aid local governments in selecting appropriate enumerators to maximize tool effectiveness in practice.

Quality & Quantity
University of Hohenheim (DE), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (VN)
Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Income, Poverty, and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.