The Kretauer-Kelly-Bridge Model: Human-in-the-Loop Governance for Limiting Autonomous AI Systems under Uncertainty

This working paper introduces the Kretauer-Kelly-Bridge Model (KKB), a human-in-the-loop governance and decision architecture designed to limit autonomous AI system progression under structural uncertainty. The model addresses a core deficit of contemporary AI governance frameworks: the absence of an explicit ex-ante decision layer that determines whether system progression should occur at all. The KKB operates as a supervisory control and decision architecture preceding optimization, safety mechanisms, and alignment approaches. It systematically separates technical capability from normative legitimacy and treats progression as a consent-based decision rather than a default process. By formalizing responsible limitation and binding progression decisions to identifiable human responsibility, the Kretauer-Kelly-Bridge reframes AI governance from performance optimization toward accountability, legitimacy, and system maturity in autonomous socio-technical systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18174155
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Kretauer-Kelly-Bridge Model: Human-in-the-Loop Governance for Limiting Autonomous AI Systems under Uncertainty

Christian Kretauer
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

The Kretauer-Kelly-Bridge Model: Human-in-the-Loop Governance for Limiting Autonomous AI Systems under Uncertainty

Christian Kretauer
article en

Abstract

This working paper introduces the Kretauer-Kelly-Bridge Model (KKB), a human-in-the-loop governance and decision architecture designed to limit autonomous AI system progression under structural uncertainty. The model addresses a core deficit of contemporary AI governance frameworks: the absence of an explicit ex-ante decision layer that determines whether system progression should occur at all. The KKB operates as a supervisory control and decision architecture preceding optimization, safety mechanisms, and alignment approaches. It systematically separates technical capability from normative legitimacy and treats progression as a consent-based decision rather than a default process. By formalizing responsible limitation and binding progression decisions to identifiable human responsibility, the Kretauer-Kelly-Bridge reframes AI governance from performance optimization toward accountability, legitimacy, and system maturity in autonomous socio-technical systems.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Oldham Council (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Kretauer-Kelly-Bridge Model: Human-in-the-Loop Governance for Limiting Autonomous AI Systems under Uncertainty — Christian Kretauer · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS