Subacute coronary artery occlusion: complexities of the grey zone

The clinical manifestations and management of obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease vary across acute (acute coronary syndromes) and chronic (chronic coronary syndromes) settings, each with distinct benefits and risks. Most acute occlusions require emergent revascularization to prevent myocardial damage and reduce the risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. Conversely, most symptomatic chronic occlusions are treated with guideline-directed medical therapy while revascularization is reserved to provide symptom relief in those with refractory symptoms despite medical therapy. Subacute coronary occlusions (SCOs), a group that historically has not been well defined, are positioned in the grey zone between these extremes, yet pose significant clinical challenges and require case-by-case assessment. This review explores the nuances of managing SCOs, highlighting the importance of tailored strategies for each clinical context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Heart Journal
Published
2025-12-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf1077
Primary Topic
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subacute coronary artery occlusion: complexities of the grey zone

Emmanouil S Brilakis, Yader Sandoval, Fernando Alfonso, Michaella Alexandrou
European Heart Journal
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
article

Subacute coronary artery occlusion: complexities of the grey zone

Emmanouil S Brilakis, Yader Sandoval, Fernando Alfonso, Michaella Alexandrou
article en

Abstract

The clinical manifestations and management of obstructive epicardial coronary artery disease vary across acute (acute coronary syndromes) and chronic (chronic coronary syndromes) settings, each with distinct benefits and risks. Most acute occlusions require emergent revascularization to prevent myocardial damage and reduce the risk for major adverse cardiovascular events. Conversely, most symptomatic chronic occlusions are treated with guideline-directed medical therapy while revascularization is reserved to provide symptom relief in those with refractory symptoms despite medical therapy. Subacute coronary occlusions (SCOs), a group that historically has not been well defined, are positioned in the grey zone between these extremes, yet pose significant clinical challenges and require case-by-case assessment. This review explores the nuances of managing SCOs, highlighting the importance of tailored strategies for each clinical context.

European Heart Journal
Abbott Northwestern Hospital (US), Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (ES)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.