The Role of Physical Ability in Team Partner Selection in Adolescent Physical Education: Examining Ability- and Gender-Based Differences

Previous research has highlighted physical ability to be an important factor for adolescents’ social acceptance and peer relationships in physical education. However, it has not yet been highlighted whether students of different physical ability and gender differ in their preferences for selecting peers in physical education. A sample of 472 students (48.1% girls) from 21 grade 5 classes in Germany completed questionnaires to assess the role of physical ability on team partner selection in physical education. Using exponential random graph models, this study examined differences in team partner nominations based on physical ability, friendship and gender for students of different physical ability and gender. Results show that high performing students and boys are more frequently chosen as team partners, and that high performing students emphasize the physical ability of their peers significantly more than low performing students. Additionally, all students preferred to play with their friends and peers of the same gender, and no differences in team partner selection could be observed for boys and girls. Further analyses reveal that low performing students are rarely chosen as team partners, especially by high performers. The findings highlight the prominent role of physical ability for peer relationships in physical education and demonstrate how students’ selection patterns drive differences in the social acceptance of high and low performing students.

Publication Details

Journal
Merrill-Palmer Quarterly
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.0.a980149
Primary Topic
Physical Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Physical Ability in Team Partner Selection in Adolescent Physical Education: Examining Ability- and Gender-Based Differences

Merrill-Palmer Quarterly
Physical Education and Pedagogy
article

The Role of Physical Ability in Team Partner Selection in Adolescent Physical Education: Examining Ability- and Gender-Based Differences

article en

Abstract

Previous research has highlighted physical ability to be an important factor for adolescents’ social acceptance and peer relationships in physical education. However, it has not yet been highlighted whether students of different physical ability and gender differ in their preferences for selecting peers in physical education. A sample of 472 students (48.1% girls) from 21 grade 5 classes in Germany completed questionnaires to assess the role of physical ability on team partner selection in physical education. Using exponential random graph models, this study examined differences in team partner nominations based on physical ability, friendship and gender for students of different physical ability and gender. Results show that high performing students and boys are more frequently chosen as team partners, and that high performing students emphasize the physical ability of their peers significantly more than low performing students. Additionally, all students preferred to play with their friends and peers of the same gender, and no differences in team partner selection could be observed for boys and girls. Further analyses reveal that low performing students are rarely chosen as team partners, especially by high performers. The findings highlight the prominent role of physical ability for peer relationships in physical education and demonstrate how students’ selection patterns drive differences in the social acceptance of high and low performing students.

Merrill-Palmer Quarterly
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Physical Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.