4D Flow Yields Similar Clinical Results Compared To 2D Phase Contrast for Decision Making Regarding Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot

2D phase contrast (PC) CMR is critical for monitoring pulmonary regurgitant fraction (PRF) in patients with a history of repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) and guides decisions about pulmonary valve replacement (PVR). However, newer techniques such as 3D time-resolved phase contrast (4D flow) MRI are gaining momentum due to the added clinical value beyond conventional flow metrics. While agreement between 2D PC CMR and 4D flow is well-established, the real-world implications for clinical decision-making have not been fully studied and are thus the primary aim of this study. All patients with rTOF who underwent standard CMR plus retrospectively gated 4D flow between February 2021 - June 2023 were identified. Clinical information was collected from the electronic medical record (EMR). 2D cine steady-state free procession (SSFP), PC data, and 4D flow imaging data were analyzed using standard post-processing analysis. Clinical decisions ("intervention vs. no intervention") were determined using a standardized algorithm, and inter-rater agreement was assessed using the intra-class coefficient (ICC) and the [Formula: see text] coefficient. 33 patients were included. PRF correlated strongly between 2D PC and 4D flow (r = 0.87, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.89) and between 4D flow and volumetric SSFP analysis (r = 0.81, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.79). The mean absolute difference between 2D and 4D PRF was - 3.76% (95% CI [-6.91, -0.60]) with an ICC of 0.83. Inter-rater agreement for the decision was moderate ([Formula: see text]=0.58) using only PRF calculated only using 2D PC and 4D flow, and was strong ([Formula: see text]=0.76) when using PRF calculated by 2D PC and 4D flow with volumetric PRF. Though clinical indications for PVR in rTOF vary, 4D flow generates accurate measurements of PRF and yields similar clinical decisions about intervention in rTOF. Future studies exploring ventricular volume assessment by 4D flow could potentially eliminate the need for cine SSFP acquisitions and lead to a shorter, more comprehensive CMR exam for TOF patients.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pediatric Cardiology
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-025-04146-3
Primary Topic
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

4D Flow Yields Similar Clinical Results Compared To 2D Phase Contrast for Decision Making Regarding Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot

Andrada Popescu, Alison Almgren‐Bell, Joshua Daniel Robinson, Aparna Sodhi et al.
Pediatric Cardiology
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
article

4D Flow Yields Similar Clinical Results Compared To 2D Phase Contrast for Decision Making Regarding Pulmonary Valve Replacement in Repaired Tetralogy of Fallot

Andrada Popescu, Alison Almgren‐Bell, Joshua Daniel Robinson, Aparna Sodhi, M. Markl, Cynthia K. Rigsby
article en

Abstract

2D phase contrast (PC) CMR is critical for monitoring pulmonary regurgitant fraction (PRF) in patients with a history of repaired tetralogy of Fallot (rTOF) and guides decisions about pulmonary valve replacement (PVR). However, newer techniques such as 3D time-resolved phase contrast (4D flow) MRI are gaining momentum due to the added clinical value beyond conventional flow metrics. While agreement between 2D PC CMR and 4D flow is well-established, the real-world implications for clinical decision-making have not been fully studied and are thus the primary aim of this study. All patients with rTOF who underwent standard CMR plus retrospectively gated 4D flow between February 2021 - June 2023 were identified. Clinical information was collected from the electronic medical record (EMR). 2D cine steady-state free procession (SSFP), PC data, and 4D flow imaging data were analyzed using standard post-processing analysis. Clinical decisions ("intervention vs. no intervention") were determined using a standardized algorithm, and inter-rater agreement was assessed using the intra-class coefficient (ICC) and the [Formula: see text] coefficient. 33 patients were included. PRF correlated strongly between 2D PC and 4D flow (r = 0.87, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.89) and between 4D flow and volumetric SSFP analysis (r = 0.81, r<sub>s</sub> = 0.79). The mean absolute difference between 2D and 4D PRF was - 3.76% (95% CI [-6.91, -0.60]) with an ICC of 0.83. Inter-rater agreement for the decision was moderate ([Formula: see text]=0.58) using only PRF calculated only using 2D PC and 4D flow, and was strong ([Formula: see text]=0.76) when using PRF calculated by 2D PC and 4D flow with volumetric PRF. Though clinical indications for PVR in rTOF vary, 4D flow generates accurate measurements of PRF and yields similar clinical decisions about intervention in rTOF. Future studies exploring ventricular volume assessment by 4D flow could potentially eliminate the need for cine SSFP acquisitions and lead to a shorter, more comprehensive CMR exam for TOF patients.

Pediatric Cardiology
Northwestern University (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US), McCormick Theological Seminary (US), Lurie Children's Hospital (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Congenital Heart Disease Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.