Lost in LOD: Analyzing the Linked Open Data Cloud Quality Maze

Since 2007, the Linked Open Data (LOD) Cloud has served as a central hub for datasets following Linked Data (LD) principles, offering a large repository of interconnected information. Over time, it has undergone multiple quality assessments to ensure datasets are accessible, well-maintained, and meet standards. Grounded on metadata assessment performed over time, this paper examines the current quality of the LOD Cloud by analyzing 1,658 datasets from the December 2024 snapshot, evaluated against 52 quality metrics. By proposing a reproducible methodology, it reports about the quality assessment and the trend analysis assessing progress, identifying persistent problems, and verifying how datasets registered in the LOD Cloud evolve over time. According to results, many earlier issues persist. Datasets still lack consistency in metadata structure, licenses, and distribution format. Moreover, they mainly remain in archived versions, with real-time access often poorly maintained. Well-curated, up-to-date datasets are exceptions rather than the rule.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Data and Information Quality
Published
2026-01-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3786331
Primary Topic
Library Science and Information Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost in LOD: Analyzing the Linked Open Data Cloud Quality Maze

Anisa Rula, Gabriele Tuozzo, Maria Angela Pellegrino
Journal of Data and Information Quality
Library Science and Information Systems
article

Lost in LOD: Analyzing the Linked Open Data Cloud Quality Maze

Anisa Rula, Gabriele Tuozzo, Maria Angela Pellegrino
article en

Abstract

Since 2007, the Linked Open Data (LOD) Cloud has served as a central hub for datasets following Linked Data (LD) principles, offering a large repository of interconnected information. Over time, it has undergone multiple quality assessments to ensure datasets are accessible, well-maintained, and meet standards. Grounded on metadata assessment performed over time, this paper examines the current quality of the LOD Cloud by analyzing 1,658 datasets from the December 2024 snapshot, evaluated against 52 quality metrics. By proposing a reproducible methodology, it reports about the quality assessment and the trend analysis assessing progress, identifying persistent problems, and verifying how datasets registered in the LOD Cloud evolve over time. According to results, many earlier issues persist. Datasets still lack consistency in metadata structure, licenses, and distribution format. Moreover, they mainly remain in archived versions, with real-time access often poorly maintained. Well-curated, up-to-date datasets are exceptions rather than the rule.

Journal of Data and Information QualityVol. 18(1)
University of Salerno (IT), Brescia University (US), University of Brescia (IT)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Library Science and Information Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lost in LOD: Analyzing the Linked Open Data Cloud Quality Maze — Anisa Rula, Gabriele Tuozzo, et al. · Journal of Data and Information Quality (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS