Human-Resource-Development for the future provision of Clinical Pharmaceutical Services.

<i>Background and aim:</i> To implement Clinical Pharmaceutical Services (CPS) in routine hospital care with limited resources, their use should be prioritized. We present an objectifiable approach to planning development particularly for pharmaceutical staff. <i>Investigations:</i> We designed a Human Resource Development Score (HRD): HRD=P-([I+F]/2) with P: prioritization score of CPS assessed by a pharmaceutical expert panel; I: intensity score of CPS currently offered in routine care; F: frequency score of CPS offered; all scores ranged from 0[min]4[max]. An HRD<0 indicates a future decrease, HRD=0 no change and HRD>0 a desirable increase in the pharmaceutical staff development. To obtain an estimated future development (ΔHRD), we multiplied HRD as a weighting factor by the proportion of current or evaluated for the start of the respective CPS pharmaceutical staff positions (n, median per hospital pharmacy) as follows: ΔHRD=HRD*n. We calculated the ΔHRD in 155 of 162 CPS for which all required data were available. <i>Results:</i> In the "Top-5 categories to be increased", the pharmaceutical staff positions (n) and the Human Resource Development (ΔHRD=HRD*n) were as follows (median per hospital pharmacy): 1. "Interfaces"/"Closed-loop concepts" (n: 1.850; ΔHRD: +7.400), 2. "Progress-management"/"Interdisciplinary ward-rounds" (2.000; +2.000), 3. "Progress-management"/"Nursing ward-rounds" (1.000; +2.000). 4. "Interfaces"/"Electronic-prescription and knowledge-support" (0.300; +1.200), 5. "Progress-management"/"Ward-rounds for high-risk-patients" (1.100; +1.100). The most relevant categories whose resources could potentially be decreased to support other CPS were assessed as: "Indication-related (non-patient-related) drug analysis" (0.500; -0.250) and "Oncology consultations" (0.275; -0.275). <i>Conclusions:</i> With the help of a weighted Human Resource Development Score based on an expert panel, proposals for Human Resource Development in CPS were calculated.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1691/ph.2025.5618
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Human-Resource-Development for the future provision of Clinical Pharmaceutical Services.

Thilo Bertsche, L Riedel, A Lange -Böhmer
PubMed
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Human-Resource-Development for the future provision of Clinical Pharmaceutical Services.

Thilo Bertsche, L Riedel, A Lange -Böhmer
article en

Abstract

<i>Background and aim:</i> To implement Clinical Pharmaceutical Services (CPS) in routine hospital care with limited resources, their use should be prioritized. We present an objectifiable approach to planning development particularly for pharmaceutical staff. <i>Investigations:</i> We designed a Human Resource Development Score (HRD): HRD=P-([I+F]/2) with P: prioritization score of CPS assessed by a pharmaceutical expert panel; I: intensity score of CPS currently offered in routine care; F: frequency score of CPS offered; all scores ranged from 0[min]4[max]. An HRD<0 indicates a future decrease, HRD=0 no change and HRD>0 a desirable increase in the pharmaceutical staff development. To obtain an estimated future development (ΔHRD), we multiplied HRD as a weighting factor by the proportion of current or evaluated for the start of the respective CPS pharmaceutical staff positions (n, median per hospital pharmacy) as follows: ΔHRD=HRD*n. We calculated the ΔHRD in 155 of 162 CPS for which all required data were available. <i>Results:</i> In the "Top-5 categories to be increased", the pharmaceutical staff positions (n) and the Human Resource Development (ΔHRD=HRD*n) were as follows (median per hospital pharmacy): 1. "Interfaces"/"Closed-loop concepts" (n: 1.850; ΔHRD: +7.400), 2. "Progress-management"/"Interdisciplinary ward-rounds" (2.000; +2.000), 3. "Progress-management"/"Nursing ward-rounds" (1.000; +2.000). 4. "Interfaces"/"Electronic-prescription and knowledge-support" (0.300; +1.200), 5. "Progress-management"/"Ward-rounds for high-risk-patients" (1.100; +1.100). The most relevant categories whose resources could potentially be decreased to support other CPS were assessed as: "Indication-related (non-patient-related) drug analysis" (0.500; -0.250) and "Oncology consultations" (0.275; -0.275). <i>Conclusions:</i> With the help of a weighted Human Resource Development Score based on an expert panel, proposals for Human Resource Development in CPS were calculated.

PubMedVol. 80(11)
Bundeswehr Joint Medical Service (DE), University Hospital Leipzig (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.