Validation of a markerless motion capture app for automated scoring of sit-to-stand, timed up and go, and short physical performance battery tests in adults with chronic disease

Physical performance tests such as the 30-second Sit-to-Stand (30s-STS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) are widely used to assess physical function in older adults and are predictive of key health outcomes. However, their routine use in clinical practice is limited by time, resource, and personnel constraints. This study aimed to validate the automated scoring of physical performance assessments using a mobile, markerless motion capture (MMC) app compared to scoring by a certified exercise physiologist (CEP), and to quantify the rate and reasons for technology-related data loss. 228 adults (mean age = 61.6 ± 11.9 years) with at least one chronic medical condition were enrolled. Participants completed seven performance assessments: 30s-STS, TUG, and all components of the SPPB (Side-by-Side, Semi-Tandem and Tandem balance stands, 5-times Sit-to-Stand (5xSTS), and Gait Speed). All tests were scored simultaneously by a CEP and the MMC app using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-enabled iPad. Agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and weighted Cohen's kappa. Agreement between the MMC app and CEP was good to excellent for all assessments. ICCs ranged from 0.812 (Tandem Stand) to 0.995 (5xSTS). The overall SPPB score showed almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.808). Perfect agreement with no variability was observed for the Side-by-Side and Semi-Tandem balance tests. The overall tech-related data loss rate was low (3.1%), with the most common issue being poor motion tracking quality (1.3%). Automated scoring of physical performance tests using a self-contained MMC app demonstrated high agreement with expert scoring and low data loss in a cohort of participants with a range of chronic medical conditions. These findings support the use of MMC-enabled mobile applications for scalable, accessible, and objective assessment of physical function in clinical settings, with future potential for remote and asynchronous use.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001172
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
60.11
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of a markerless motion capture app for automated scoring of sit-to-stand, timed up and go, and short physical performance battery tests in adults with chronic disease

Margaret L. McNeely, Victor E. Ezeugwu, Puneeta Tandon, Jennifer K. Bertrand et al.
1 citations
PLOS Digital Health
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
60.11
article

Validation of a markerless motion capture app for automated scoring of sit-to-stand, timed up and go, and short physical performance battery tests in adults with chronic disease

Margaret L. McNeely, Victor E. Ezeugwu, Puneeta Tandon, Jennifer K. Bertrand, Jack Bates, Jenil Kanani, Joshua Joy
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Physical performance tests such as the 30-second Sit-to-Stand (30s-STS), Timed Up and Go (TUG), and Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) are widely used to assess physical function in older adults and are predictive of key health outcomes. However, their routine use in clinical practice is limited by time, resource, and personnel constraints. This study aimed to validate the automated scoring of physical performance assessments using a mobile, markerless motion capture (MMC) app compared to scoring by a certified exercise physiologist (CEP), and to quantify the rate and reasons for technology-related data loss. 228 adults (mean age = 61.6 ± 11.9 years) with at least one chronic medical condition were enrolled. Participants completed seven performance assessments: 30s-STS, TUG, and all components of the SPPB (Side-by-Side, Semi-Tandem and Tandem balance stands, 5-times Sit-to-Stand (5xSTS), and Gait Speed). All tests were scored simultaneously by a CEP and the MMC app using a Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR)-enabled iPad. Agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and weighted Cohen's kappa. Agreement between the MMC app and CEP was good to excellent for all assessments. ICCs ranged from 0.812 (Tandem Stand) to 0.995 (5xSTS). The overall SPPB score showed almost perfect agreement (κ = 0.808). Perfect agreement with no variability was observed for the Side-by-Side and Semi-Tandem balance tests. The overall tech-related data loss rate was low (3.1%), with the most common issue being poor motion tracking quality (1.3%). Automated scoring of physical performance tests using a self-contained MMC app demonstrated high agreement with expert scoring and low data loss in a cohort of participants with a range of chronic medical conditions. These findings support the use of MMC-enabled mobile applications for scalable, accessible, and objective assessment of physical function in clinical settings, with future potential for remote and asynchronous use.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 5(1)
University of Alberta (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
60.11
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.