Neuroethics in Suicide Prevention: An East Asian Perspective

According to the World Health Organization, over 700,000 people die by suicide each year, accounting for 1.3% of global deaths. As neuroscience and neurotechnology increasingly shape suicide research and prevention, East Asian societies such as Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan-historically more permissive toward suicide-have enacted laws emphasizing multi-level psychosocial interventions. Despite advances in neuroscientific inquiry, neuroethical reflection on suicide prevention remains limited. This paper proposes a culturally grounded neuroethical framework that integrates neurorights, disability rights, and cultural perspectives. Rejecting reductionist views of suicide as mere brain dysfunction, it examines how direct and indirect brain interventions, cognitive liberty, and cultural mediation interact in shaping moral and policy responses. It argues that the suicidal brain and culture are co-produced phenomena, dynamically evolving within complex neuroethical structures that shape contemporary suicide prevention.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AJOB Neuroscience
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2025.2601351
Primary Topic
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neuroethics in Suicide Prevention: An East Asian Perspective

Kevin Chien-Chang Wu
AJOB Neuroscience
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
article

Neuroethics in Suicide Prevention: An East Asian Perspective

Kevin Chien-Chang Wu
article en

Abstract

According to the World Health Organization, over 700,000 people die by suicide each year, accounting for 1.3% of global deaths. As neuroscience and neurotechnology increasingly shape suicide research and prevention, East Asian societies such as Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan-historically more permissive toward suicide-have enacted laws emphasizing multi-level psychosocial interventions. Despite advances in neuroscientific inquiry, neuroethical reflection on suicide prevention remains limited. This paper proposes a culturally grounded neuroethical framework that integrates neurorights, disability rights, and cultural perspectives. Rejecting reductionist views of suicide as mere brain dysfunction, it examines how direct and indirect brain interventions, cognitive liberty, and cultural mediation interact in shaping moral and policy responses. It argues that the suicidal brain and culture are co-produced phenomena, dynamically evolving within complex neuroethical structures that shape contemporary suicide prevention.

AJOB Neuroscience
National Taiwan University (TW), National Taiwan University Hospital (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.