Cortical hierarchy and aphasia severity: the sensorimotor–association gradient modulates lesion effects within language-specific networks
Aphasia severity after stroke varies widely and is not fully explained by lesion size or location. We propose that incorporating the brain's sensorimotor-association (S-A) gradient, reflecting cortical hierarchy, offers a biologically grounded framework for predicting language outcomes. In 236 individuals with chronic left-hemisphere stroke, we examine whether the hierarchical position of lesions in language-specific (LS) and domain-general (DG) areas modulates aphasia severity. We parcellate lesions using a cortical atlas and weigh them by each region's S-A rank. We apply hierarchical linear regression to test whether S-A ranking and its interaction with lesion volume improves prediction of Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R-AQ) scores. Across models, lesion volume in lower S-A regions is more detrimental than in higher-order areas. The LS-only model yields the highest explanatory power (adjusted R<sup>2</sup> = 0.426). These findings reveal that cortical hierarchy shapes post-stroke language outcomes and should be considered in future models of aphasia recovery.
Authors
- Natalie Busby (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7117-7899)
- Leonardo Bonilha (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6153-8942)
- Ida Rangus (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9189-8941)
- Sigfus Kristinsson (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0459-5369)
- Nicholas B. Riccardi
- Janina Wilmskoetter (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1083-7301)
- Roger Newman-Norlund
- Julius Fridriksson
- Chris Rorden
- Dirk B. den Ouden
Institutions
- Medical University of South Carolina (US)
- University of South Carolina (US)
- Columbia University (US)
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Communications Biology
- Published
- 2026-01-08
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-025-09375-z
- Primary Topic
- Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00