The “Double Reduction” Policy in China: Evaluation Index System Construction on the Implementation Effectiveness

This study develops a systematic, theory-driven evaluation index system to address the critical gap in assessing the implementation effectiveness of China’s “Double Reduction” policy. Grounded in Policy Implementation Theory and Educational Policy Evaluation Frameworks, the study employed a mixed-methods approach involving policy text analysis of five core documents and a two-round Delphi consultation with 23 experts (authority coefficient Cr = 0.7928). Index weights were determined through comprehensive weighting (AHP and Entropy Weight Method), and the system was empirically validated via fuzzy comprehensive evaluation with data from 163 teachers across four Chinese provinces. The resulting framework comprises 2 first-grade, 5 second-grade, and 23 third-grade indexes. Empirical results indicate an overall “good” policy implementation effect (score = 72.96/90), with “Quality of Education and Teaching” (weight = 0.2856) and “Level of After-School Services” (weight = 0.2269) as the most influential indicators. However, weaker performance was observed in reducing homework burden and promoting balanced compulsory education. This research provides the first unified evaluation tool for the “Double Reduction” policy, offering both a practical instrument for local Chinese governance and a replicable model for other regions grappling with the challenge of balancing student burden reduction and educational quality improvement.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SAGE Open
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251407053
Primary Topic
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “Double Reduction” Policy in China: Evaluation Index System Construction on the Implementation Effectiveness

Bing Zhou, Junjian Li, Yadong Ding
SAGE Open
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
article

The “Double Reduction” Policy in China: Evaluation Index System Construction on the Implementation Effectiveness

Bing Zhou, Junjian Li, Yadong Ding
article en

Abstract

This study develops a systematic, theory-driven evaluation index system to address the critical gap in assessing the implementation effectiveness of China’s “Double Reduction” policy. Grounded in Policy Implementation Theory and Educational Policy Evaluation Frameworks, the study employed a mixed-methods approach involving policy text analysis of five core documents and a two-round Delphi consultation with 23 experts (authority coefficient Cr = 0.7928). Index weights were determined through comprehensive weighting (AHP and Entropy Weight Method), and the system was empirically validated via fuzzy comprehensive evaluation with data from 163 teachers across four Chinese provinces. The resulting framework comprises 2 first-grade, 5 second-grade, and 23 third-grade indexes. Empirical results indicate an overall “good” policy implementation effect (score = 72.96/90), with “Quality of Education and Teaching” (weight = 0.2856) and “Level of After-School Services” (weight = 0.2269) as the most influential indicators. However, weaker performance was observed in reducing homework burden and promoting balanced compulsory education. This research provides the first unified evaluation tool for the “Double Reduction” policy, offering both a practical instrument for local Chinese governance and a replicable model for other regions grappling with the challenge of balancing student burden reduction and educational quality improvement.

SAGE OpenVol. 16(1)
Ningbo University (CN), East China Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Global Educational Reforms and Inequalities
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.