Decoupling Adsorption and Photocatalysis: Addressing the Dark Adsorption Pitfall in Catalyst Ranking

Heterogeneous photocatalysis relies on the adsorption of the target molecule to the surface of the catalyst and the photocatalytic action of the material to degrade target molecules. In many reports, a 30 min dark adsorption time is used prior to exposure of the system to light and initiation of photocatalysis with no discussion of differences in adsorption rate or capacity when comparing catalystswhen adsorption rates or capacities are very different, misleading catalyst rankings may result. Even closely related materials, such as the ZnO-based photocatalysts discussed here, adsorb target molecules at different rates, have different adsorption capacities, and have apparently different photocatalytic rates. When typical methods for evaluating photocatalysts are used, the adsorption effects are not accounted for. Here, we illustrate potential concerns while evaluating photocatalysts and present a simple, low-concentration method to possibly addressand avoidadsorption effects. Interestingly, catalyst rankings change when adsorption effects are minimized by circumventing dark adsorption using the low concentration approach presented.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Omega
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.5c09004
Primary Topic
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoupling Adsorption and Photocatalysis: Addressing the Dark Adsorption Pitfall in Catalyst Ranking

Sarah K. St. Angelo, Jordan E. Cox, Anna Dougan-Bacha
ACS Omega
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
article

Decoupling Adsorption and Photocatalysis: Addressing the Dark Adsorption Pitfall in Catalyst Ranking

Sarah K. St. Angelo, Jordan E. Cox, Anna Dougan-Bacha
article en

Abstract

Heterogeneous photocatalysis relies on the adsorption of the target molecule to the surface of the catalyst and the photocatalytic action of the material to degrade target molecules. In many reports, a 30 min dark adsorption time is used prior to exposure of the system to light and initiation of photocatalysis with no discussion of differences in adsorption rate or capacity when comparing catalystswhen adsorption rates or capacities are very different, misleading catalyst rankings may result. Even closely related materials, such as the ZnO-based photocatalysts discussed here, adsorb target molecules at different rates, have different adsorption capacities, and have apparently different photocatalytic rates. When typical methods for evaluating photocatalysts are used, the adsorption effects are not accounted for. Here, we illustrate potential concerns while evaluating photocatalysts and present a simple, low-concentration method to possibly addressand avoidadsorption effects. Interestingly, catalyst rankings change when adsorption effects are minimized by circumventing dark adsorption using the low concentration approach presented.

ACS OmegaVol. 11(2)
Dickinson College (US)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Advanced Photocatalysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.