Thrown off balance: left-handers are under-represented in elite throwing sports

Abstract Compared to the approximately 10% prevalence of left-handers in the general population, left-handedness is over-represented among athletes in various antagonistic, duel-based sports, such as combat sports (e.g. fencing) and interactive ball games (e.g. table tennis). This over-representation is considered indirect evidence of a competitive advantage, often attributed to right-handers’ unfamiliarity with left-handed opponents’ action patterns and/or to superior neuropsychological and motor control abilities among left-handed athletes. While extensive research has examined left-handedness in antagonistic sports, its impact in non-antagonistic disciplines—where direct interactive contests are absent—remains largely underexplored. To address this gap, we analysed left-hander prevalence among over 6000 elite track-and-field athletes ranked in year-end world rankings (2005–2024) across javelin throw, discus throw and shot put. Handedness was determined by athletes’ functional hand used for sport performance, i.e. their throwing or putting hand. Our findings reveal a striking under-representation of left-handed athletes in all three disciplines (approx. 2–5%), for both female and male athletes, compared to the approximately 10% prevalence in the general population. While left-handedness may confer advantages in certain antagonistic sports, our findings suggest it may pose disadvantages in non-antagonistic contexts. We discuss several factors potentially contributing to this pattern.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.251982
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Thrown off balance: left-handers are under-represented in elite throwing sports

Elisa Frasnelli, Tim Simon, Florian Loffing
1 citations
Royal Society Open Science
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
29.71
article

Thrown off balance: left-handers are under-represented in elite throwing sports

Elisa Frasnelli, Tim Simon, Florian Loffing
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Compared to the approximately 10% prevalence of left-handers in the general population, left-handedness is over-represented among athletes in various antagonistic, duel-based sports, such as combat sports (e.g. fencing) and interactive ball games (e.g. table tennis). This over-representation is considered indirect evidence of a competitive advantage, often attributed to right-handers’ unfamiliarity with left-handed opponents’ action patterns and/or to superior neuropsychological and motor control abilities among left-handed athletes. While extensive research has examined left-handedness in antagonistic sports, its impact in non-antagonistic disciplines—where direct interactive contests are absent—remains largely underexplored. To address this gap, we analysed left-hander prevalence among over 6000 elite track-and-field athletes ranked in year-end world rankings (2005–2024) across javelin throw, discus throw and shot put. Handedness was determined by athletes’ functional hand used for sport performance, i.e. their throwing or putting hand. Our findings reveal a striking under-representation of left-handed athletes in all three disciplines (approx. 2–5%), for both female and male athletes, compared to the approximately 10% prevalence in the general population. While left-handedness may confer advantages in certain antagonistic sports, our findings suggest it may pose disadvantages in non-antagonistic contexts. We discuss several factors potentially contributing to this pattern.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 13(1)
German Sport University Cologne (DE), University of Trento (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience
29.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.