Forging Common Paths: A Systematic Review of Co‐Creation and Collaborative Learning in Adaptation Pathways

ABSTRACT We examine how co‐creation and collaborative learning have been operationalized in climate adaptation pathway development over the past decade using a systematic review of 36 case study papers. While co‐creation and collaborative learning are increasingly recognized as important for effective adaptation planning, it remains unclear how different approaches can support adaptation goals. Our co‐creation analysis identifies three participation clusters: (i) information‐focused participation involving primarily one‐way knowledge extraction through interviews; (ii) researcher‐mediated participation featuring two‐way engagement through workshops, while researchers maintain process control; and (iii) co‐organized participation where stakeholders serve as co‐designers with defined leadership roles throughout the process. For collaborative learning, defined as structured knowledge exchange and capacity building among stakeholders, we distinguish between instrumental learning that emerges incidentally from stakeholder interaction versus process‐integrated learning that is explicitly designed and monitored throughout pathway development. Cases with co‐organized participation consistently aligned with process‐integrated learning, suggesting these approaches can be mutually beneficial. Analysis of reported impacts (including policy implementation, follow‐up research, and capacity building outcomes) reveals that more extensive participation combined with organized learning correlates with a greater likelihood of impacts. This review contributes to the growing body of knowledge on stakeholder engagement in adaptation pathways planning, and while the identified participation clusters and learning approaches offer systematic guidance for methodology selection, they should be viewed as flexible frameworks rather than prescriptive categories, adaptable to specific contexts and planning objectives. This article is categorized under: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Participatory Methods of Integrated Assessment Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Learning from Cases and Analogies Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Integrated Assessment by Expert Panels

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.70038
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Forging Common Paths: A Systematic Review of Co‐Creation and Collaborative Learning in Adaptation Pathways

Fulco Ludwig, S.E. Werners, Bregje van der Bolt, Wouter Smolenaars et al.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
article

Forging Common Paths: A Systematic Review of Co‐Creation and Collaborative Learning in Adaptation Pathways

Fulco Ludwig, S.E. Werners, Bregje van der Bolt, Wouter Smolenaars, Wout Jan‐Willem Sommerauer
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We examine how co‐creation and collaborative learning have been operationalized in climate adaptation pathway development over the past decade using a systematic review of 36 case study papers. While co‐creation and collaborative learning are increasingly recognized as important for effective adaptation planning, it remains unclear how different approaches can support adaptation goals. Our co‐creation analysis identifies three participation clusters: (i) information‐focused participation involving primarily one‐way knowledge extraction through interviews; (ii) researcher‐mediated participation featuring two‐way engagement through workshops, while researchers maintain process control; and (iii) co‐organized participation where stakeholders serve as co‐designers with defined leadership roles throughout the process. For collaborative learning, defined as structured knowledge exchange and capacity building among stakeholders, we distinguish between instrumental learning that emerges incidentally from stakeholder interaction versus process‐integrated learning that is explicitly designed and monitored throughout pathway development. Cases with co‐organized participation consistently aligned with process‐integrated learning, suggesting these approaches can be mutually beneficial. Analysis of reported impacts (including policy implementation, follow‐up research, and capacity building outcomes) reveals that more extensive participation combined with organized learning correlates with a greater likelihood of impacts. This review contributes to the growing body of knowledge on stakeholder engagement in adaptation pathways planning, and while the identified participation clusters and learning approaches offer systematic guidance for methodology selection, they should be viewed as flexible frameworks rather than prescriptive categories, adaptable to specific contexts and planning objectives. This article is categorized under: Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Participatory Methods of Integrated Assessment Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Learning from Cases and Analogies Integrated Assessment of Climate Change > Integrated Assessment by Expert Panels

Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate ChangeVol. 17(1)
Institute for Environment and Human Security (DE), International Water Management Institute (IWMI) (LK), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.