On Construction of Tibial Plateau Fracture Detection in Different Radiographic Views Using YOLO Models

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Tibial plateau fractures are difficult to detect using X-ray imaging due to limited three-dimensional visibility. This study evaluated the performance of four You Only Look Once (YOLO) deep learning models trained on different radiographic views for fracture detection. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 1489 knee X-rays were collected from a tertiary referral hospital, comprising 727 fracture images and 762 non-fracture images. YOLOv4, YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv9 were each trained using anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and combined views. <b>Results:</b> YOLO models trained on AP views consistently outperformed those trained on other views. YOLOv9 trained on AP images achieved the highest accuracy, specificity, precision, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99, with both sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) at 1.00. YOLOv8 trained on AP views reached 0.97 across all metrics with an AUC of 0.98. YOLOv5 trained on AP images achieved an accuracy and F1-score of 0.98, a sensitivity and NPV of 0.97, and an AUC of 1.00. YOLOv4 trained on AP views showed slightly lower performance, with an accuracy and F1-score of 0.96 and an AUC of 1.00. External validation confirmed the strong generalizability of AP-trained models, particularly YOLOv9, which reached an accuracy of 0.87, a sensitivity of 1.00, a specificity of 0.75, a precision of 0.80, an NPV of 1.00, an F1-score of 0.88, and an AUC of 0.93. Artificial intelligence-assisted YOLO models showed strong potential in detecting tibial plateau fractures. <b>Conclusions:</b> Models trained on AP views consistently achieved better diagnostic accuracy than those using other views. Among all, YOLOv9 delivered the best results, highlighting the benefits of newer deep learning architectures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16020182
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Construction of Tibial Plateau Fracture Detection in Different Radiographic Views Using YOLO Models

Han-Ting Shih, Shun-Ping Wang, Endah Kristiani, Jung-Chun Liu Liu et al.
Diagnostics
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

On Construction of Tibial Plateau Fracture Detection in Different Radiographic Views Using YOLO Models

Han-Ting Shih, Shun-Ping Wang, Endah Kristiani, Jung-Chun Liu Liu, Yang Chao-Tung, Yu-Xiang Liao, Chih-Han Wei
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Tibial plateau fractures are difficult to detect using X-ray imaging due to limited three-dimensional visibility. This study evaluated the performance of four You Only Look Once (YOLO) deep learning models trained on different radiographic views for fracture detection. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 1489 knee X-rays were collected from a tertiary referral hospital, comprising 727 fracture images and 762 non-fracture images. YOLOv4, YOLOv5, YOLOv8, and YOLOv9 were each trained using anteroposterior (AP), lateral, and combined views. <b>Results:</b> YOLO models trained on AP views consistently outperformed those trained on other views. YOLOv9 trained on AP images achieved the highest accuracy, specificity, precision, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.99, with both sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) at 1.00. YOLOv8 trained on AP views reached 0.97 across all metrics with an AUC of 0.98. YOLOv5 trained on AP images achieved an accuracy and F1-score of 0.98, a sensitivity and NPV of 0.97, and an AUC of 1.00. YOLOv4 trained on AP views showed slightly lower performance, with an accuracy and F1-score of 0.96 and an AUC of 1.00. External validation confirmed the strong generalizability of AP-trained models, particularly YOLOv9, which reached an accuracy of 0.87, a sensitivity of 1.00, a specificity of 0.75, a precision of 0.80, an NPV of 1.00, an F1-score of 0.88, and an AUC of 0.93. Artificial intelligence-assisted YOLO models showed strong potential in detecting tibial plateau fractures. <b>Conclusions:</b> Models trained on AP views consistently achieved better diagnostic accuracy than those using other views. Among all, YOLOv9 delivered the best results, highlighting the benefits of newer deep learning architectures.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(2)
National Chung Hsing University (TW), Tunghai University (TW), Krida Wacana Christian University (ID), Kuang Tien General Hospital (TW), Taichung Veterans General Hospital (TW)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.