Lived experiences and impacts of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a meta-ethnographic synthesis

Background This meta-ethnographic review synthesised qualitative evidence on the lived experiences and impacts of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). By incorporating insights from individuals who have undergone FGM/C, men and healthcare providers caring for affected populations, the study enriches understanding of the practice and its multifaceted consequences. Methods Using Noblit and Hare’s seven-stage meta-ethnographic framework, an inductive and interpretive synthesis was conducted. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, African Journals Online (AJOL) and the WHO website, identified qualitative and mixed-method studies that captured in-depth perspectives on FGM/C. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and Ames et al ’s 5-point scale was applied to evaluate the conceptual richness of each study. Results Fifty-three qualitative studies spanning diverse geographical and cultural contexts, both in traditionally practising regions and migrant communities, were included. Through rigorous analysis of first-order constructs (participant quotes) and second-order constructs (study authors’ themes), five overarching themes were developed: (1) the onset: inherited tradition and gendered expectations; (2) ramifications on health and well-being; (3) inadequate health-seeking behaviours and lack of comprehensive healthcare services; (4) the psychosocial toll and (5) the perceived benefits of FGM/C. Each overarching theme comprises second-order constructs, along with participants’ quotes. Conclusion This synthesis demonstrates how FGM/C is deeply intertwined with sociocultural norms and functions as a bidirectional bridge, presenting a complex dilemma for the health of women and girls, healthcare systems and broader society. On one hand, it serves as a pivotal gateway to sociocultural belonging and a source of social capital, shaping women’s and girls’ lives long after the practice itself. On the other hand, it inflicts immediate, short-term and long-term health impacts and poses considerable challenges for healthcare systems due to its diverse and interconnected consequences. This complexity makes it challenging to address all related issues within a single setting or with a single specialist, often leaving affected individuals behind in accessing the highest attainable quality of care and support, while simultaneously complicating elimination efforts. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023387750.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Public Health
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2024-001907
Primary Topic
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lived experiences and impacts of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a meta-ethnographic synthesis

Gedefaw Abeje Fekadu, Asteray Assmie Ayenew, Billie F. Bradford, B.W. Mol
BMJ Public Health
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
article

Lived experiences and impacts of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a meta-ethnographic synthesis

Gedefaw Abeje Fekadu, Asteray Assmie Ayenew, Billie F. Bradford, B.W. Mol
article en

Abstract

Background This meta-ethnographic review synthesised qualitative evidence on the lived experiences and impacts of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C). By incorporating insights from individuals who have undergone FGM/C, men and healthcare providers caring for affected populations, the study enriches understanding of the practice and its multifaceted consequences. Methods Using Noblit and Hare’s seven-stage meta-ethnographic framework, an inductive and interpretive synthesis was conducted. A comprehensive search of electronic databases, including PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, ResearchGate, African Journals Online (AJOL) and the WHO website, identified qualitative and mixed-method studies that captured in-depth perspectives on FGM/C. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies, and Ames et al ’s 5-point scale was applied to evaluate the conceptual richness of each study. Results Fifty-three qualitative studies spanning diverse geographical and cultural contexts, both in traditionally practising regions and migrant communities, were included. Through rigorous analysis of first-order constructs (participant quotes) and second-order constructs (study authors’ themes), five overarching themes were developed: (1) the onset: inherited tradition and gendered expectations; (2) ramifications on health and well-being; (3) inadequate health-seeking behaviours and lack of comprehensive healthcare services; (4) the psychosocial toll and (5) the perceived benefits of FGM/C. Each overarching theme comprises second-order constructs, along with participants’ quotes. Conclusion This synthesis demonstrates how FGM/C is deeply intertwined with sociocultural norms and functions as a bidirectional bridge, presenting a complex dilemma for the health of women and girls, healthcare systems and broader society. On one hand, it serves as a pivotal gateway to sociocultural belonging and a source of social capital, shaping women’s and girls’ lives long after the practice itself. On the other hand, it inflicts immediate, short-term and long-term health impacts and poses considerable challenges for healthcare systems due to its diverse and interconnected consequences. This complexity makes it challenging to address all related issues within a single setting or with a single specialist, often leaving affected individuals behind in accessing the highest attainable quality of care and support, while simultaneously complicating elimination efforts. PROSPERO registration number CRD42023387750.

BMJ Public HealthVol. 4(1)
Monash Medical Centre (AU), Monash Health (AU), Monash University (AU), Bahir Dar University (ET)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.