Talk or action? Unveiling the nature and depth of climate disclosures in Islamic banks using machine learning

Climate risk has become a board-level and supervisory priority, yet little is known about how Islamic banks—subject to both conventional regulation and Shariah principles—communicate their climate commitments. Drawing on 838 annual reports from 103 Islamic banks across 25 jurisdictions during 2015–2024, this study develops a four-step natural-language–processing pipeline that combines rule-based precision with context-aware machine learning. Findings reveal that climate language appears in 84 % of bank-year observations but remains governance-heavy and metric-light, strategy narratives account for 64 % of TCFD-aligned sentences, whereas metrics & targets comprise only 11 %. Mentions of ESG governance and climate stress-testing surged six-fold after 2020, reflecting alignment with NGFS supervisory guidance and intensified regulatory uptake in Southeast Asia and the Gulf. Nonetheless, renewable-finance and net-zero narratives remain peripheral (< 3 %). These results highlight a disclosure regime characterized by rapid narrative diffusion yet limited quantitative substance, challenging assumptions about Islamic finance’s presumed ethical advantage and informing regulators seeking more decision-useful climate reporting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Borsa Istanbul Review
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2026.100789
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
59.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Talk or action? Unveiling the nature and depth of climate disclosures in Islamic banks using machine learning

Muhammad Bilal Zafar
1 citations
Borsa Istanbul Review
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
59.40
article

Talk or action? Unveiling the nature and depth of climate disclosures in Islamic banks using machine learning

Muhammad Bilal Zafar
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Climate risk has become a board-level and supervisory priority, yet little is known about how Islamic banks—subject to both conventional regulation and Shariah principles—communicate their climate commitments. Drawing on 838 annual reports from 103 Islamic banks across 25 jurisdictions during 2015–2024, this study develops a four-step natural-language–processing pipeline that combines rule-based precision with context-aware machine learning. Findings reveal that climate language appears in 84 % of bank-year observations but remains governance-heavy and metric-light, strategy narratives account for 64 % of TCFD-aligned sentences, whereas metrics & targets comprise only 11 %. Mentions of ESG governance and climate stress-testing surged six-fold after 2020, reflecting alignment with NGFS supervisory guidance and intensified regulatory uptake in Southeast Asia and the Gulf. Nonetheless, renewable-finance and net-zero narratives remain peripheral (< 3 %). These results highlight a disclosure regime characterized by rapid narrative diffusion yet limited quantitative substance, challenging assumptions about Islamic finance’s presumed ethical advantage and informing regulators seeking more decision-useful climate reporting.

Borsa Istanbul ReviewVol. 26(2)
University of Technology Malaysia (MY)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Sustainable Finance and Green Bonds
59.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.