AUTOMATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC: CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE DRAFT “ADM AMENDMENT” TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CODE

This article examines the emerging regulation of automated administrative decision-making in the Czech Republic, with a focus on the recent proposal to introduce a new Section 15a into the Administrative Procedure Code. While the initiative reflects broader European efforts to digitalize public administration, it also exposes serious deficiencies in legislative technique, legal safeguards, and compliance with European law. The analysis situates the Czech debate against the background of existing domestic practices, such as algorithmic processing in tax administration and simplified enforcement mechanisms in traffic law, none of which presently authorize fully automated decisions. Using doctrinal analysis, critical regulatory assessment, and a targeted comparative perspective drawing on Sweden, Germany, and France, the article demonstrates that the Czech proposal fails to provide the necessary clarity, safeguards, and systemic preparation. It concludes that a responsible framework must be comprehensive, government-led, and accompanied by explicit criteria, robust safeguards, and institutional adaptation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
STUDIA IURIDICA Casoviensia
Published
2025-12-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33542/sic2025-s-11
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ombudsman and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.20
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AUTOMATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC: CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE DRAFT “ADM AMENDMENT” TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CODE

Vladimír SHARP, Jan Nešpor, Eliška Klimentová
1 citations
STUDIA IURIDICA Casoviensia
Ombudsman and Human Rights
4.20
article

AUTOMATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC: CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE DRAFT “ADM AMENDMENT” TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CODE

Vladimír SHARP, Jan Nešpor, Eliška Klimentová
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article examines the emerging regulation of automated administrative decision-making in the Czech Republic, with a focus on the recent proposal to introduce a new Section 15a into the Administrative Procedure Code. While the initiative reflects broader European efforts to digitalize public administration, it also exposes serious deficiencies in legislative technique, legal safeguards, and compliance with European law. The analysis situates the Czech debate against the background of existing domestic practices, such as algorithmic processing in tax administration and simplified enforcement mechanisms in traffic law, none of which presently authorize fully automated decisions. Using doctrinal analysis, critical regulatory assessment, and a targeted comparative perspective drawing on Sweden, Germany, and France, the article demonstrates that the Czech proposal fails to provide the necessary clarity, safeguards, and systemic preparation. It concludes that a responsible framework must be comprehensive, government-led, and accompanied by explicit criteria, robust safeguards, and institutional adaptation.

STUDIA IURIDICA CasoviensiaVol. 13(3)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Ombudsman and Human Rights
4.20
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AUTOMATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN THE CZECH REPUBLIC: CRITICAL REFLECTIONS ON THE DRAFT “ADM AMENDMENT” TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE CODE — Vladimír SHARP, Jan Nešpor, et al. · STUDIA IURIDICA Casoviensia (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS