Incidence, magnitude & sport-specific factors of rugby tackles from different directions in youth rugby

Rugby tackles can cause head acceleration events (HAEs) which may acutely and chronically affect brain health. This study aimed to investigate the varying proportions, impact forces and rugby-specific factors of tackles from different directions relative to the ball carrier which may illuminate strategies to reduce injury and health risks. Boys from four youth boys’ teams in New Zealand (one U13 club: n = 19 players, 13 matches; two U16 club: n = 41, mean of 31.5 matches; one U16 representative: n = 26, 8 matches) wore instrumented mouthguards and all matches were videoed and analyzed to verify the collisions resulting in a tackle and code them based on rugby-specific and biomechanical factors (anticipation, falling, head position, face position). Of the 2539 tackles resulting in HAEs, most were front-on (56–64%). Tackle direction had no significant effect on either mean peak linear or rotational acceleration, however significantly fewer tackles from the rear resulted in impacts that would trigger an elite rugby head injury assessment than tackles from the front and side. The older and more skilled players more often had correct head positioning in front and side-on tackles, whereas almost none of the tackles from the rear had incorrect head positioning. Additional training focus should be given to tackles from the side and rear with younger players as they have poorer anticipation in these directions often resulting in higher HAE magnitude. Face up tackling seems to be best for reducing impact forces in tackles from behind, while face down tackling appears to be safest for front-on tackles.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541251394457
Primary Topic
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence, magnitude & sport-specific factors of rugby tackles from different directions in youth rugby

Nick Draper, Tracy R. Melzer, Michael J. Hamlin, Tim Anderson et al.
International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
article

Incidence, magnitude & sport-specific factors of rugby tackles from different directions in youth rugby

Nick Draper, Tracy R. Melzer, Michael J. Hamlin, Tim Anderson, Nicole Spriggs, George Stilwell, Danyon Stitt, Deborah L. Snell, Stefan Henley, Alan Clark, Sinéad Moylett, Keith Alexander, Annette Swale, Kevin Mangan, Congyu Xu, Rich S. W. Masters, Stacey Niao, Nick Maitland, Blair Johnstone, Arindam Basu, Natalia Kabaliuk
article en

Abstract

Rugby tackles can cause head acceleration events (HAEs) which may acutely and chronically affect brain health. This study aimed to investigate the varying proportions, impact forces and rugby-specific factors of tackles from different directions relative to the ball carrier which may illuminate strategies to reduce injury and health risks. Boys from four youth boys’ teams in New Zealand (one U13 club: n = 19 players, 13 matches; two U16 club: n = 41, mean of 31.5 matches; one U16 representative: n = 26, 8 matches) wore instrumented mouthguards and all matches were videoed and analyzed to verify the collisions resulting in a tackle and code them based on rugby-specific and biomechanical factors (anticipation, falling, head position, face position). Of the 2539 tackles resulting in HAEs, most were front-on (56–64%). Tackle direction had no significant effect on either mean peak linear or rotational acceleration, however significantly fewer tackles from the rear resulted in impacts that would trigger an elite rugby head injury assessment than tackles from the front and side. The older and more skilled players more often had correct head positioning in front and side-on tackles, whereas almost none of the tackles from the rear had incorrect head positioning. Additional training focus should be given to tackles from the side and rear with younger players as they have poorer anticipation in these directions often resulting in higher HAE magnitude. Face up tackling seems to be best for reducing impact forces in tackles from behind, while face down tackling appears to be safest for front-on tackles.

International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching
California State University, Fullerton (US), University of Canterbury (NZ), Lincoln University - Pennsylvania (US), Pacific Radiology (New Zealand) (NZ), New Zealand Brain Research Institute (NZ), University of Waikato (NZ), University of Greenwich (GB), University of Otago (NZ)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Traumatic Brain Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.