From Diagnosis to Decision—Fetal Limb Abnormalities

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Our aim was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound (US) in fetal limb abnormalities. As a secondary target, we wanted to correlate various predictors for the diagnosis accuracy. <b>Methods:</b> We prospectively enrolled cases with routine prenatal US performed in five participating centers. Subsequently, we selected and processed all cases with limb abnormalities: suspected, diagnosed, and missed on the prenatal diagnosis scans. We collected data on the type of anomaly, the US equipment and probes used, the operator's expertise, the gestational age at the diagnosis, the length of the examination, and the use of US reporting form. SPSS 22.0 software was applied to perform the analyses using non-parametric statistical methods. Associations between categorical variables were evaluated using Fisher's exact test and Chi-square tests. For correlations between the gestational age and the anomaly severity, we used Spearman's rank-order correlation. Predictive performance of operator- and scan-related variables for diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with area under the curve (AUC) estimates, standard errors (SE), confidence intervals (95% CI), and <i>p</i>-values reported. <b>Results:</b> Our data showed that most US examinations were performed as part of routine screening (79.7%), and the most frequent anomaly diagnosed was clubfoot. Operators' expertise demonstrated the highest predictive performance, while technical parameters-scan duration (AUC = 0.20, <i>p</i> = 0.1188) and US equipment (AUC = 0.30, <i>p</i> = 0.3478)-did not significantly predict diagnostic accuracy. <b>Conclusions:</b> The overall diagnostic accuracy of prenatal US was 85.5%. Our findings indicate that diagnostic performance is driven primarily by operator expertise and training, rather than by gestational age at scan and technical parameters.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15020486
Primary Topic
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From Diagnosis to Decision—Fetal Limb Abnormalities

Răzvan Cosmin Pană, Ş. Tudorache, Florin Burada, Andreea Florentina Stancioi-Cismaru et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
article

From Diagnosis to Decision—Fetal Limb Abnormalities

Răzvan Cosmin Pană, Ş. Tudorache, Florin Burada, Andreea Florentina Stancioi-Cismaru, Mihaela Gheonea, Marina Dinu, Bianca Cătălina Andreiana, Mihaela-Simona Naidin, Oana Sorina Tica, C. Constantin, Razvan Grigoras Capitanescu
article en

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives:</b> Our aim was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of prenatal ultrasound (US) in fetal limb abnormalities. As a secondary target, we wanted to correlate various predictors for the diagnosis accuracy. <b>Methods:</b> We prospectively enrolled cases with routine prenatal US performed in five participating centers. Subsequently, we selected and processed all cases with limb abnormalities: suspected, diagnosed, and missed on the prenatal diagnosis scans. We collected data on the type of anomaly, the US equipment and probes used, the operator's expertise, the gestational age at the diagnosis, the length of the examination, and the use of US reporting form. SPSS 22.0 software was applied to perform the analyses using non-parametric statistical methods. Associations between categorical variables were evaluated using Fisher's exact test and Chi-square tests. For correlations between the gestational age and the anomaly severity, we used Spearman's rank-order correlation. Predictive performance of operator- and scan-related variables for diagnostic accuracy was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, with area under the curve (AUC) estimates, standard errors (SE), confidence intervals (95% CI), and <i>p</i>-values reported. <b>Results:</b> Our data showed that most US examinations were performed as part of routine screening (79.7%), and the most frequent anomaly diagnosed was clubfoot. Operators' expertise demonstrated the highest predictive performance, while technical parameters-scan duration (AUC = 0.20, <i>p</i> = 0.1188) and US equipment (AUC = 0.30, <i>p</i> = 0.3478)-did not significantly predict diagnostic accuracy. <b>Conclusions:</b> The overall diagnostic accuracy of prenatal US was 85.5%. Our findings indicate that diagnostic performance is driven primarily by operator expertise and training, rather than by gestational age at scan and technical parameters.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(2)
Clinical Emergency Hospital Bucharest (RO), University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova (RO), County Hospital (GB), University of Craiova (RO)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.