Incentivizing social norm elicitation

Abstract Across three studies involving more than 5,000 participants, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the effects of incentivizing responses in the Krupka-Weber norm elicitation task. We consider both the potential benefits of incentivization (higher response quality and mitigation of response biases) and its possible drawbacks (distortion of responses in the direction of norm-unrelated focal points and materialistic values). We find no evidence of undesirable effects of incentives. While we report only modest improvements in response quality, we also show that incentives effectively mitigate response biases that arise when participants’ self-serving motivations conflict with accurate responding.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Experimental Economics
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/eec.2025.10036
Primary Topic
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incentivizing social norm elicitation

Francesco Fallucchi, Hanna Fromell, Daniele Nosenzo
Experimental Economics
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
article

Incentivizing social norm elicitation

Francesco Fallucchi, Hanna Fromell, Daniele Nosenzo
article en

Abstract

Abstract Across three studies involving more than 5,000 participants, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the effects of incentivizing responses in the Krupka-Weber norm elicitation task. We consider both the potential benefits of incentivization (higher response quality and mitigation of response biases) and its possible drawbacks (distortion of responses in the direction of norm-unrelated focal points and materialistic values). We find no evidence of undesirable effects of incentives. While we report only modest improvements in response quality, we also show that incentives effectively mitigate response biases that arise when participants’ self-serving motivations conflict with accurate responding.

Experimental Economics
University of Bergamo (IT)
Aarhus Universitet, Università degli studi di Bergamo, Aarhus Universitets Forskningsfond
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Incentivizing social norm elicitation — Francesco Fallucchi, Hanna Fromell, et al. · Experimental Economics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS