Stakeholders' interpretations and responses to research as a feature of advanced practice: A scoping review

Research appears underdeveloped but is narrowly defined in advanced practice, often measured by traditional outputs rather than processes and impacts on learning and development. This review highlights the need for a comprehensive, theory-informed approach to understanding research in advanced practice. Such insights are crucial for shaping educational curricula, professional development, and organisational strategies to better support advanced practitioners as leaders and contributors to healthcare innovation.The EQUATOR guidelines for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews have been met.There was no patient or public contribution to report for this scoping review.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnsa.2026.100483
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stakeholders' interpretations and responses to research as a feature of advanced practice: A scoping review

Carley Moore, Marion Waite, Olga KOZLOWSKA
International Journal of Nursing Studies Advances
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Stakeholders' interpretations and responses to research as a feature of advanced practice: A scoping review

Carley Moore, Marion Waite, Olga KOZLOWSKA
article en

Abstract

Research appears underdeveloped but is narrowly defined in advanced practice, often measured by traditional outputs rather than processes and impacts on learning and development. This review highlights the need for a comprehensive, theory-informed approach to understanding research in advanced practice. Such insights are crucial for shaping educational curricula, professional development, and organisational strategies to better support advanced practitioners as leaders and contributors to healthcare innovation.The EQUATOR guidelines for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews have been met.There was no patient or public contribution to report for this scoping review.

International Journal of Nursing Studies AdvancesVol. 10
Oxford Brookes University (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.