(In)justice in Smart Cities: Barriers and an Integrative Framework for Solution Pathways From a Global Perspective

ABSTRACT Smart city initiatives aim for sustainability and inclusiveness, but recent evidence shows that they often lead to injustices. Although this contradiction has received growing academic attention, a comprehensive understanding of how justice is addressed within smart city practices remains limited. Therefore, this study conducts a systematic review of 67 empirical articles to identify key barriers to achieving justice in smart city development, analyze their global distribution, and suggest pathways toward more equitable outcomes. Six major barriers were identified: institutional, legacy, economic, social, technical, and geographical, with institutional barriers being the most prominent globally. We found that barriers vary depending on the context. For instance, the Americas face governance shortcomings and infrastructural inequalities; Asia's rapid urbanization intensifies administrative weaknesses; Africa suffers from capacity and resource gaps; Oceania's rigid institutions obstruct inclusion; while in Europe, coordination challenges exist despite stronger governance systems. To address these challenges, the study proposes a governance‐centered framework emphasizing justice integration across planning and implementation, supporting the advancement of Sustainable Development Goals 11 and 16.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sustainable Development
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.70620
Primary Topic
Smart Cities and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

(In)justice in Smart Cities: Barriers and an Integrative Framework for Solution Pathways From a Global Perspective

Ayyoob Sharifi, Emilio Costales, Dominik Beckers, Md. Nazmul Haque et al.
Sustainable Development
Smart Cities and Technologies
article

(In)justice in Smart Cities: Barriers and an Integrative Framework for Solution Pathways From a Global Perspective

Ayyoob Sharifi, Emilio Costales, Dominik Beckers, Md. Nazmul Haque, Samar Aad, Luca Mora
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Smart city initiatives aim for sustainability and inclusiveness, but recent evidence shows that they often lead to injustices. Although this contradiction has received growing academic attention, a comprehensive understanding of how justice is addressed within smart city practices remains limited. Therefore, this study conducts a systematic review of 67 empirical articles to identify key barriers to achieving justice in smart city development, analyze their global distribution, and suggest pathways toward more equitable outcomes. Six major barriers were identified: institutional, legacy, economic, social, technical, and geographical, with institutional barriers being the most prominent globally. We found that barriers vary depending on the context. For instance, the Americas face governance shortcomings and infrastructural inequalities; Asia's rapid urbanization intensifies administrative weaknesses; Africa suffers from capacity and resource gaps; Oceania's rigid institutions obstruct inclusion; while in Europe, coordination challenges exist despite stronger governance systems. To address these challenges, the study proposes a governance‐centered framework emphasizing justice integration across planning and implementation, supporting the advancement of Sustainable Development Goals 11 and 16.

Sustainable Development
Tallinn University of Technology (EE), Hiroshima University (JP), Khulna University of Engineering and Technology (BD), The University of Queensland (AU), Edinburgh Napier University (GB), University of Greenwich (GB), Lebanese American University (LB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Smart Cities and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.