To build or not to build? Sustainability narratives between growth-oriented ‘eco-markets’ and regulative ‘sufficiency’ in Germany's heat transition

Narratives play a significant role in shaping sustainability transitions. The amendment to the German Building Energy Act ( Gebäudeenergiegesetz ) in 2023, aiming at stricter emission regulations for heating appliances, provides a striking example: its original version was weakened following a strong counter-campaign led by conservative and right-wing political actors. In media debates, misinformation and populist narratives of ‘the people’ affected by the GEG and a ‘green elite’ were used to delegitimize the amendment. However, it remains unclear if affected stakeholders share these narratives and what their visions of sustainability in heating and housing transitions entail. We employed semi-structured interviews to gain insights from 23 expert practitioners across 6 key stakeholder groups affected by the GEG. Content and narrative analysis reveal that sustainability as such is not directly questioned. Instead, two distinct narratives emerge: First, a Sustainable Markets Narrative , predominantly promoted by entrepreneurial actors, emphasising the need for new construction, innovation through markets, eco-efficiency, and market-compatible policies. Second, a Sufficiency Narrative , predominantly supported by Non-Governmental Organisations and administrative actors, that relies on policy mixes, considers rethinking ownership structures, and prioritises the conversion of existing buildings over new construction. However, this narrative is much less common and lacks positive, guiding imaginaries. To position policy proposals on a spectrum from weak to strong sufficiency, we referenced the Energy Sufficiency Policy Database. We find consensus across stakeholders regarding weak approaches such as senior-friendly shared housing or energy consultancy. Regulatory policies like rent caps are absent, indicating a notable science-stakeholder gap regarding stronger sufficiency proposals. • 23 interviews with practitioners of the German heating and housing transition • ‘Sustainable Market Narrative’ dominates emphasising the need for new buildings. • ‘Sufficiency Narrative’ prioritises social innovation and conversion of buildings. • Broad consensus for weak sufficiency proposals, e.g. senior-friendly shared housing • Science-stakeholder gap regarding stronger sufficiency policy proposals

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Research & Social Science
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2025.104527
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
36.62
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To build or not to build? Sustainability narratives between growth-oriented ‘eco-markets’ and regulative ‘sufficiency’ in Germany's heat transition

Valentin Sagvosdkin, Josephine Semb, Lukas Bäuerle, Barbara Praetorius
1 citations
Energy Research & Social Science
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
36.62
article

To build or not to build? Sustainability narratives between growth-oriented ‘eco-markets’ and regulative ‘sufficiency’ in Germany's heat transition

Valentin Sagvosdkin, Josephine Semb, Lukas Bäuerle, Barbara Praetorius
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Narratives play a significant role in shaping sustainability transitions. The amendment to the German Building Energy Act ( Gebäudeenergiegesetz ) in 2023, aiming at stricter emission regulations for heating appliances, provides a striking example: its original version was weakened following a strong counter-campaign led by conservative and right-wing political actors. In media debates, misinformation and populist narratives of ‘the people’ affected by the GEG and a ‘green elite’ were used to delegitimize the amendment. However, it remains unclear if affected stakeholders share these narratives and what their visions of sustainability in heating and housing transitions entail. We employed semi-structured interviews to gain insights from 23 expert practitioners across 6 key stakeholder groups affected by the GEG. Content and narrative analysis reveal that sustainability as such is not directly questioned. Instead, two distinct narratives emerge: First, a Sustainable Markets Narrative , predominantly promoted by entrepreneurial actors, emphasising the need for new construction, innovation through markets, eco-efficiency, and market-compatible policies. Second, a Sufficiency Narrative , predominantly supported by Non-Governmental Organisations and administrative actors, that relies on policy mixes, considers rethinking ownership structures, and prioritises the conversion of existing buildings over new construction. However, this narrative is much less common and lacks positive, guiding imaginaries. To position policy proposals on a spectrum from weak to strong sufficiency, we referenced the Energy Sufficiency Policy Database. We find consensus across stakeholders regarding weak approaches such as senior-friendly shared housing or energy consultancy. Regulatory policies like rent caps are absent, indicating a notable science-stakeholder gap regarding stronger sufficiency proposals. • 23 interviews with practitioners of the German heating and housing transition • ‘Sustainable Market Narrative’ dominates emphasising the need for new buildings. • ‘Sufficiency Narrative’ prioritises social innovation and conversion of buildings. • Broad consensus for weak sufficiency proposals, e.g. senior-friendly shared housing • Science-stakeholder gap regarding stronger sufficiency policy proposals

Energy Research & Social ScienceVol. 131
Johannes Kepler University of Linz (AT), HTW Berlin - University of Applied Sciences (DE), Universität Hamburg (DE), Europa-Universität Flensburg (DE), Technische Universität Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Sustainability and Climate Change Governance
36.62
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.