Factorization of Alzheimer’s disease genetic risk influences allow patient stratification, predicting disease onset, cognitive decline, and cell-type specific responses

Late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex and heterogeneous neurodegenerative disease with significant genetic components implicated in at least 97 loci from AD genome-wide association studies. While various distinct AD subtypes have been identified based on brain or CSF molecular profiling, contribution of the genetic signatures in distinguishing the AD subtypes is lacking. Here, we leveraged large snRNA-seq postmortem brain data with an empirical Bayes matrix factorization (EBMF) approach to study common effects of 197 AD risk variants on neuronal and glial cell transcriptome, enabling factor-based polygenic score (fPGS) and patient clustering based on their functional genetic profiles. We confirmed that each factor captures specific AD risk variant influences on cell types and known AD-associated biological processes, such as mitochondrial activity, endo-lysosomal activity, mRNA processing, neuroinflammation, or calcium signaling. Further, we found that most fPGS were predicting a certain neuropathological or AD-associated molecular condition. Notably, fPGS3 predicts somatic mutation burden in excitatory neurons, and fPGS7 predicts epigenome erosion in excitatory neurons associated with lipid transport disorders, increased mitochondrial activity, and increased Tau pathology. Finally, unsupervised clustering analysis of individuals with mild cognitive impairment and AD based on their fPGS profiles enable us to identify seven clusters, which are differentiated by the <i>APOE</i> genotype. Among them, five groups were subdivided within <i>APOE3</i> homozygotes, which remarkably predicted either the disease severity or the disease onset with up to 6 years differences among groups. Resilient groups were associated with reduced matrisome and reactivity in astrocytes and increased cholesterol metabolic pathways in oligodendrocytes and OPCs. Overall, the analyses confirmed the ability of EBMF to stratify AD risk variant influences into molecularly and clinically coherent factors that allow genetic predictions of particular cell types and alterations of biological processes impacting the disease.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-01-08
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.01.02.697432
Primary Topic
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Factorization of Alzheimer’s disease genetic risk influences allow patient stratification, predicting disease onset, cognitive decline, and cell-type specific responses

Julia T.C.W., Tony Tuck, Alexandre Pelletier
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
article

Factorization of Alzheimer’s disease genetic risk influences allow patient stratification, predicting disease onset, cognitive decline, and cell-type specific responses

Julia T.C.W., Tony Tuck, Alexandre Pelletier
article en

Abstract

Late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a complex and heterogeneous neurodegenerative disease with significant genetic components implicated in at least 97 loci from AD genome-wide association studies. While various distinct AD subtypes have been identified based on brain or CSF molecular profiling, contribution of the genetic signatures in distinguishing the AD subtypes is lacking. Here, we leveraged large snRNA-seq postmortem brain data with an empirical Bayes matrix factorization (EBMF) approach to study common effects of 197 AD risk variants on neuronal and glial cell transcriptome, enabling factor-based polygenic score (fPGS) and patient clustering based on their functional genetic profiles. We confirmed that each factor captures specific AD risk variant influences on cell types and known AD-associated biological processes, such as mitochondrial activity, endo-lysosomal activity, mRNA processing, neuroinflammation, or calcium signaling. Further, we found that most fPGS were predicting a certain neuropathological or AD-associated molecular condition. Notably, fPGS3 predicts somatic mutation burden in excitatory neurons, and fPGS7 predicts epigenome erosion in excitatory neurons associated with lipid transport disorders, increased mitochondrial activity, and increased Tau pathology. Finally, unsupervised clustering analysis of individuals with mild cognitive impairment and AD based on their fPGS profiles enable us to identify seven clusters, which are differentiated by the <i>APOE</i> genotype. Among them, five groups were subdivided within <i>APOE3</i> homozygotes, which remarkably predicted either the disease severity or the disease onset with up to 6 years differences among groups. Resilient groups were associated with reduced matrisome and reactivity in astrocytes and increased cholesterol metabolic pathways in oligodendrocytes and OPCs. Overall, the analyses confirmed the ability of EBMF to stratify AD risk variant influences into molecularly and clinically coherent factors that allow genetic predictions of particular cell types and alterations of biological processes impacting the disease.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Boston University (US), University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
BrightFocus Foundation, Edward N. and Della L. Thome Memorial Foundation, Health Resources in Action, National Institutes of Health, National Institute on Aging
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.