KEY CHALLENGES AND TRADEOFFS IN IMPLEMENTING REACTIVE SYSTEMS IN ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT

Enterprise adoption of reactive systems concentrates gains in tail-latency control and elasticity while shifting complexity into boundary design, testing, and governance. A structured synthesis of ten recent sources integrates pattern-level performance evidence, model-predictive autoscaling for stream workloads, feedback-driven overload control with client-side balancing, explainable performance prediction for rapid mitigation, and domain-driven decomposition outcomes in industry. Joint compute–cache–storage models refine capacity planning beyond CPU-only approximations, and runtime adaptation principles for data-stream processing outline operator-aware scaling and back-pressure design. A systematic review of change impact maps propagation through schemas, event contracts, and shared libraries, motivating contract testing and versioned evolution by default. The paper distills decision rules for selective adoption and a platform checklist that reduces operational toil. Findings guide architects who need explicit trade-off navigation across performance, resilience, testability, and cost in heterogeneous enterprise portfolios.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18164261
Primary Topic
Software System Performance and Reliability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

KEY CHALLENGES AND TRADEOFFS IN IMPLEMENTING REACTIVE SYSTEMS IN ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT

Artem Kucheruk
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Software System Performance and Reliability
article

KEY CHALLENGES AND TRADEOFFS IN IMPLEMENTING REACTIVE SYSTEMS IN ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT

Artem Kucheruk
article en

Abstract

Enterprise adoption of reactive systems concentrates gains in tail-latency control and elasticity while shifting complexity into boundary design, testing, and governance. A structured synthesis of ten recent sources integrates pattern-level performance evidence, model-predictive autoscaling for stream workloads, feedback-driven overload control with client-side balancing, explainable performance prediction for rapid mitigation, and domain-driven decomposition outcomes in industry. Joint compute–cache–storage models refine capacity planning beyond CPU-only approximations, and runtime adaptation principles for data-stream processing outline operator-aware scaling and back-pressure design. A systematic review of change impact maps propagation through schemas, event contracts, and shared libraries, motivating contract testing and versioned evolution by default. The paper distills decision rules for selective adoption and a platform checklist that reduces operational toil. Findings guide architects who need explicit trade-off navigation across performance, resilience, testability, and cost in heterogeneous enterprise portfolios.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Wells Fargo (United States) (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 97%
Software System Performance and Reliability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

KEY CHALLENGES AND TRADEOFFS IN IMPLEMENTING REACTIVE SYSTEMS IN ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT — Artem Kucheruk · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS