An adaptive multi-objective optimization and control framework for hydrocyclone operation under dynamic particle-size distributions

• The proposed method provides a closed-loop framework for real-time hydrocyclone operation. • It optimally updates operating parameters as the feed and performance priorities change. • A modified Johnson–SB distribution compactly represents feed particle-size distributions. • The policy spectrum delivers monotonic gains while managing the energy–separation trade-off. Hydrocyclone optimization is typically performed under fixed-condition assumptions, making its performance highly sensitive to changes in the feed particle-size distribution (PSD) and evolving process priorities. This study presents a prototype adaptive and preference-aware multi-objective optimization and control framework that adjusts inlet velocity ( V ) and feed solids concentration ( C ) in response to variations in PSD. The framework consists of four main steps: (1) Surrogate model development: A CFD-trained response-surface methodology predicts key performance objectives, including cut size ( d 50 ), separation sharpness ( E p ), underflow water-split ratio ( R f ), pressure drop ( ΔP ), and throughput ( Q ). (2) Multi-objective optimization: The NSGA-II algorithm is employed to identify Pareto-optimal trade-offs. (3) Decision-making: The TOPSIS method is used to select the optimal operating point based on user-defined weights. (4) Supervisory module: This module continuously monitors PSD and weight vectors, triggering re-optimization when predefined thresholds are exceeded, and adjusting ( V, C ) to align with updated priorities. PSDs are modeled using a modified Johnson-SB distribution, defined by median size ( d 50 ) and a dispersion/tail coefficient ( σ j , ranging from 0.40 to 1.00), where d 50 determines location and σ j controls the distribution's width and tails. In 25 PSD scenarios, adaptive set-point updates resulted in a 17–27% reduction in d 50 , a 14–25% improvement in E p , and a 38–95% increase in Q compared to a static baseline. R f remained within acceptable bounds, while ΔP varied between 0–136%, depending on separation requirements. This framework provides an efficient approach for ensuring stable separation under fluctuating feed conditions and offers a practical solution for controlling hydrocyclone performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Results in Engineering
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rineng.2026.109026
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
41.77
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An adaptive multi-objective optimization and control framework for hydrocyclone operation under dynamic particle-size distributions

Ruiping Zou, Chengfang Yuan, Zongyan Zhou, Caibin Wu et al.
1 citations
Results in Engineering
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
41.77
article

An adaptive multi-objective optimization and control framework for hydrocyclone operation under dynamic particle-size distributions

Ruiping Zou, Chengfang Yuan, Zongyan Zhou, Caibin Wu, Shibo Kuang, Yuhao Zhang, Jiaxin Cui, Dianyu E., Aibing Yu, Cong Tan, Hongwei Hu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• The proposed method provides a closed-loop framework for real-time hydrocyclone operation. • It optimally updates operating parameters as the feed and performance priorities change. • A modified Johnson–SB distribution compactly represents feed particle-size distributions. • The policy spectrum delivers monotonic gains while managing the energy–separation trade-off. Hydrocyclone optimization is typically performed under fixed-condition assumptions, making its performance highly sensitive to changes in the feed particle-size distribution (PSD) and evolving process priorities. This study presents a prototype adaptive and preference-aware multi-objective optimization and control framework that adjusts inlet velocity ( V ) and feed solids concentration ( C ) in response to variations in PSD. The framework consists of four main steps: (1) Surrogate model development: A CFD-trained response-surface methodology predicts key performance objectives, including cut size ( d 50 ), separation sharpness ( E p ), underflow water-split ratio ( R f ), pressure drop ( ΔP ), and throughput ( Q ). (2) Multi-objective optimization: The NSGA-II algorithm is employed to identify Pareto-optimal trade-offs. (3) Decision-making: The TOPSIS method is used to select the optimal operating point based on user-defined weights. (4) Supervisory module: This module continuously monitors PSD and weight vectors, triggering re-optimization when predefined thresholds are exceeded, and adjusting ( V, C ) to align with updated priorities. PSDs are modeled using a modified Johnson-SB distribution, defined by median size ( d 50 ) and a dispersion/tail coefficient ( σ j , ranging from 0.40 to 1.00), where d 50 determines location and σ j controls the distribution's width and tails. In 25 PSD scenarios, adaptive set-point updates resulted in a 17–27% reduction in d 50 , a 14–25% improvement in E p , and a 38–95% increase in Q compared to a static baseline. R f remained within acceptable bounds, while ΔP varied between 0–136%, depending on separation requirements. This framework provides an efficient approach for ensuring stable separation under fluctuating feed conditions and offers a practical solution for controlling hydrocyclone performance.

Results in EngineeringVol. 29
Dongguan University of Technology (CN), Jiangxi University of Technology (CN), UNSW Sydney (AU), Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University (CN), Division of Materials Science and Engineering (AU), Jiangsu Industry Technology Research Institute (CN), Jiangxi University of Science and Technology (CN), Monash University (AU)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Cyclone Separators and Fluid Dynamics
41.77
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.