Grammatical Errors, Financial Reporting Quality, and Audit Engagement Risk

SUMMARY We examine whether grammatical errors (GEs) in financial reports provide a timely signal of the reliability of firms’ financial information. Consistent with the notion that GEs capture the time, effort, and resources devoted to financial filings, we find that GEs are more common when firms have less time to prepare their financial reports and, importantly, that they are positively associated with the likelihood of a future restatement and the discovery of an internal control weakness. We also document a positive association between GEs and auditor effort. Collectively, our findings suggest that GEs provide a credible signal of financial reporting quality and audit engagement risk. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Published
2026-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/ajpt-2024-064
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Grammatical Errors, Financial Reporting Quality, and Audit Engagement Risk

Gabriel Pündrich, Jacquelyn Gillette, Blake Canziani
Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Grammatical Errors, Financial Reporting Quality, and Audit Engagement Risk

Gabriel Pündrich, Jacquelyn Gillette, Blake Canziani
article en

Abstract

SUMMARY We examine whether grammatical errors (GEs) in financial reports provide a timely signal of the reliability of firms’ financial information. Consistent with the notion that GEs capture the time, effort, and resources devoted to financial filings, we find that GEs are more common when firms have less time to prepare their financial reports and, importantly, that they are positively associated with the likelihood of a future restatement and the discovery of an internal control weakness. We also document a positive association between GEs and auditor effort. Collectively, our findings suggest that GEs provide a credible signal of financial reporting quality and audit engagement risk. JEL Classifications: M40; M41; M42.

Auditing A Journal of Practice & Theory
University of Florida (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.