Quality of life for middle and older aged people with chronic conditions in primary care: a cross-sectional study

Globally there is an increased prevalence of chronic conditions, which has a negative impact on quality of life (QOL)and places increased demand on the healthcare system. There is a need to understand the most suitable QOL instruments for adults with chronic health conditions in primary care settings to inform and evaluate tailored interventions. Aims of this study were to: (1) Examine and compare the QOL of middle and older aged adults with chronic conditions in primary care settings in South Australia; (2) Explore the feasibility and suitability of using the QOL-ACC in primary care settings, as compared with a more established instrument (the EQ-5D-5L). A prospective cross-sectional study using an online survey was conducted in general practice primary care settings in Adelaide, Australia, with a measurement at one time-point between July 2023-February 2024. Inclusion criteria: People aged 40–85 years who had ≥ one chronic condition, who attended one of ten participating practices. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all utility scores on QOL measures, and a Mann-Whitney U Test for differences in these scores between the participants separated into two groups based on their age. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Two hundred twenty-four participants completed surveys (mean (SD) age = 58.1 (9.5) years). A large proportion of participants indicated they had poor QOL in domains of Pain Management (43.8% had their pain well managed most of the time), Leisure Activities and Hobbies (31.3% most of the time, 21.9% some of the time) on the QOL-ACC; and moderate pain or discomfort (85.3%), anxiety and depression (62.5%), and performing their usual activities (49.1%) on the EQ-5D-5L, respectively. There were no significant differences in utility between the younger and older age groups for the EQ-5D-5L nor the QOL-ACC (except for the emotional wellbeing dimension). The QOL-ACC is a feasible and suitable QOL measure to use in primary care settings. Further validation of the QOL-ACC with middle-older adults with chronic conditions in primary care is warranted. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registration Number: ACTRN12623000939695 Registration Date: 31/08/2023.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Primary Care
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12875-025-03147-8
Primary Topic
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of life for middle and older aged people with chronic conditions in primary care: a cross-sectional study

Rachel Milte, Heather Block, Stacey George, Matthew C. Freeman et al.
BMC Primary Care
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
article

Quality of life for middle and older aged people with chronic conditions in primary care: a cross-sectional study

Rachel Milte, Heather Block, Stacey George, Matthew C. Freeman, Elsa Dent, Alison Dymmott, Alexandra Stevens, Sally Nguyen
article en

Abstract

Globally there is an increased prevalence of chronic conditions, which has a negative impact on quality of life (QOL)and places increased demand on the healthcare system. There is a need to understand the most suitable QOL instruments for adults with chronic health conditions in primary care settings to inform and evaluate tailored interventions. Aims of this study were to: (1) Examine and compare the QOL of middle and older aged adults with chronic conditions in primary care settings in South Australia; (2) Explore the feasibility and suitability of using the QOL-ACC in primary care settings, as compared with a more established instrument (the EQ-5D-5L). A prospective cross-sectional study using an online survey was conducted in general practice primary care settings in Adelaide, Australia, with a measurement at one time-point between July 2023-February 2024. Inclusion criteria: People aged 40–85 years who had ≥ one chronic condition, who attended one of ten participating practices. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all utility scores on QOL measures, and a Mann-Whitney U Test for differences in these scores between the participants separated into two groups based on their age. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Two hundred twenty-four participants completed surveys (mean (SD) age = 58.1 (9.5) years). A large proportion of participants indicated they had poor QOL in domains of Pain Management (43.8% had their pain well managed most of the time), Leisure Activities and Hobbies (31.3% most of the time, 21.9% some of the time) on the QOL-ACC; and moderate pain or discomfort (85.3%), anxiety and depression (62.5%), and performing their usual activities (49.1%) on the EQ-5D-5L, respectively. There were no significant differences in utility between the younger and older age groups for the EQ-5D-5L nor the QOL-ACC (except for the emotional wellbeing dimension). The QOL-ACC is a feasible and suitable QOL measure to use in primary care settings. Further validation of the QOL-ACC with middle-older adults with chronic conditions in primary care is warranted. Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registration Number: ACTRN12623000939695 Registration Date: 31/08/2023.

BMC Primary CareVol. 27(1)
Flinders University (AU), Torrens University Australia (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Chronic Disease Management Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.