The effects of foraminotomy and distraction-stabilization on the dimensions of the lumbosacral neuroforamen throughout range of motion

Degenerative lumbosacral stenosis (DLSS) in dogs can involve foraminal stenosis and L7 nerve root compression. Surgical options to expand the L7-S1 neuroforamen (NF) include foraminotomy and distraction-stabilization. However, the efficacy of these techniques when subjected to biomechanical loading is unclear. The study objective was to investigate the influence of spinal motion on the volume of the L7-S1 NF in the native spine and after foraminotomy and distraction-stabilization. Eight canine cadaveric spines were subsequently tested in 3 conditions: native, after unilateral foraminotomy and after distraction-stabilization of L7-S1. Spines were subjected to axial compression, flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. The volume of the L7-S1 NF was calculated for each condition and motion direction. Linear mixed models were used to analyze differences between motions and conditions. The NF in the native spine was only affected by flexion (+4.5 %±16.6;P < 0.01) and extension (-36.7 %±11.1;P < 0.01) when compared to the position neutral + axial compression. The NF dimension after foraminotomy increased in flexion (+20.4 %±24.6;P < 0.01) and decreased in extension (-35.9 %±9.3;P < 0.01). In contrast, the NF after distraction-stabilization was not affected by biomechanical motion. Foraminotomy resulted in significantly increased volumes in all loading conditions (+31.0-45.7 %;P < 0.01). Distraction-stabilization produced smaller, yet statistically significant, increases in foraminal volume across several loading directions: axial compression (+15 %±18.0;P = 0.01), ipsilateral lateral bending (+22.1 %±19.0;P < 0.01), extension (+75 %±31.6;P < 0.01) and ipsilateral (+9.3 %±12.9;P = 0.01) and contralateral axial rotation (+12.7 %±12.9;P = 0.01). Both foraminotomy and distraction-stabilization lead to significant increases in the volume of the L7-S1 NF throughout spinal movement. As such, either procedure may be effective in enlarging the L7-S1 neuroforamen compromised by DLSS.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Veterinary Journal
Published
2026-01-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2026.106549
Primary Topic
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effects of foraminotomy and distraction-stabilization on the dimensions of the lumbosacral neuroforamen throughout range of motion

Antonio Pozzi, Frank Steffen, Sebastian Knell, Raphael Arz et al.
The Veterinary Journal
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
article

The effects of foraminotomy and distraction-stabilization on the dimensions of the lumbosacral neuroforamen throughout range of motion

Antonio Pozzi, Frank Steffen, Sebastian Knell, Raphael Arz, Brian Park, Lucas A. Smolders
article en

Abstract

Degenerative lumbosacral stenosis (DLSS) in dogs can involve foraminal stenosis and L7 nerve root compression. Surgical options to expand the L7-S1 neuroforamen (NF) include foraminotomy and distraction-stabilization. However, the efficacy of these techniques when subjected to biomechanical loading is unclear. The study objective was to investigate the influence of spinal motion on the volume of the L7-S1 NF in the native spine and after foraminotomy and distraction-stabilization. Eight canine cadaveric spines were subsequently tested in 3 conditions: native, after unilateral foraminotomy and after distraction-stabilization of L7-S1. Spines were subjected to axial compression, flexion/extension, lateral bending and axial rotation. The volume of the L7-S1 NF was calculated for each condition and motion direction. Linear mixed models were used to analyze differences between motions and conditions. The NF in the native spine was only affected by flexion (+4.5 %±16.6;P < 0.01) and extension (-36.7 %±11.1;P < 0.01) when compared to the position neutral + axial compression. The NF dimension after foraminotomy increased in flexion (+20.4 %±24.6;P < 0.01) and decreased in extension (-35.9 %±9.3;P < 0.01). In contrast, the NF after distraction-stabilization was not affected by biomechanical motion. Foraminotomy resulted in significantly increased volumes in all loading conditions (+31.0-45.7 %;P < 0.01). Distraction-stabilization produced smaller, yet statistically significant, increases in foraminal volume across several loading directions: axial compression (+15 %±18.0;P = 0.01), ipsilateral lateral bending (+22.1 %±19.0;P < 0.01), extension (+75 %±31.6;P < 0.01) and ipsilateral (+9.3 %±12.9;P = 0.01) and contralateral axial rotation (+12.7 %±12.9;P = 0.01). Both foraminotomy and distraction-stabilization lead to significant increases in the volume of the L7-S1 NF throughout spinal movement. As such, either procedure may be effective in enlarging the L7-S1 neuroforamen compromised by DLSS.

The Veterinary JournalVol. 315
University of Zurich (CH), Center for Pediatric Endocrinology Zurich (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 95%
Veterinary Orthopedics and Neurology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.