Chinese higher education evaluation: theoretical analysis and method construction—Based on CIPP theory

Exploring various evaluation methods and distinguishing their applicability can help to find and explore alternative evaluation methods. Chinese higher education has its own characteristics and development laws, so higher education evaluation also has its own particularity. The theoretical paradigm of Chinese higher education evaluation should be explored, which should be rooted in the educational laws and concrete practice situations of China. Based on context, input, process, product (CIPP) educational evaluation theory, this paper analyzes the essence of process evaluation theory and objective evaluation theory firstly. Secondly, this paper compares and analyzes the applicability of general education evaluation theory in China through economic logic, systemic logic, and social reality logic. From the perspective of public welfare, values, evaluation of quality-oriented and social service-oriented, this paper constructs input, process, effectiveness (IPE) education evaluation theory based on socialist values, and the effect orientation of talents and social development evaluation (TSD). Research on CIPP evaluation theory's applicability in Chinese higher education helps to find new evaluation methods suitable for actual situations in different countries and improve the effectiveness of evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Education
Published
2026-01-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1676842
Primary Topic
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Chinese higher education evaluation: theoretical analysis and method construction—Based on CIPP theory

Yi Huang, Zhiying Deng
Frontiers in Education
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
article

Chinese higher education evaluation: theoretical analysis and method construction—Based on CIPP theory

Yi Huang, Zhiying Deng
article en

Abstract

Exploring various evaluation methods and distinguishing their applicability can help to find and explore alternative evaluation methods. Chinese higher education has its own characteristics and development laws, so higher education evaluation also has its own particularity. The theoretical paradigm of Chinese higher education evaluation should be explored, which should be rooted in the educational laws and concrete practice situations of China. Based on context, input, process, product (CIPP) educational evaluation theory, this paper analyzes the essence of process evaluation theory and objective evaluation theory firstly. Secondly, this paper compares and analyzes the applicability of general education evaluation theory in China through economic logic, systemic logic, and social reality logic. From the perspective of public welfare, values, evaluation of quality-oriented and social service-oriented, this paper constructs input, process, effectiveness (IPE) education evaluation theory based on socialist values, and the effect orientation of talents and social development evaluation (TSD). Research on CIPP evaluation theory's applicability in Chinese higher education helps to find new evaluation methods suitable for actual situations in different countries and improve the effectiveness of evaluation.

Frontiers in EducationVol. 10
Changsha University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 96%
Evaluation and Performance Assessment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.