Do we still need brands? Revisiting the essential function of trade marks and the consumer model in AI-mediated commerce

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping consumer purchasing decisions and transforming the informational environment in which brands operate. This development challenges both the trade mark law system in performing its essential function of indicating commercial origin and the human-centred model of the consumer. Key AI-mediated shopping use cases, such as recommender systems, chatbots and voice assistants, illustrate how varying degrees of technological involvement in the purchasing process reduce the relevance of trade marks as shorthand indicators of origin and quality. Although human perception remains important after purchase, AI’s growing role as an ‘intermediary filter’ in pre-purchase decisions creates new opportunities for unfair competition and risks undermining consumer welfare. In this context, adapting legal frameworks to AI-mediated commerce should involve going beyond general transparency requirements, clarifying how liability may arise, ensuring that trade marks remain visible and rethinking the consumer model so that the protection benchmark it sets remains aligned with market realities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Published
2025-11-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaf082
Primary Topic
Intellectual Property Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do we still need brands? Revisiting the essential function of trade marks and the consumer model in AI-mediated commerce

Alexandre Piron
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Intellectual Property Law
article

Do we still need brands? Revisiting the essential function of trade marks and the consumer model in AI-mediated commerce

Alexandre Piron
article en

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly shaping consumer purchasing decisions and transforming the informational environment in which brands operate. This development challenges both the trade mark law system in performing its essential function of indicating commercial origin and the human-centred model of the consumer. Key AI-mediated shopping use cases, such as recommender systems, chatbots and voice assistants, illustrate how varying degrees of technological involvement in the purchasing process reduce the relevance of trade marks as shorthand indicators of origin and quality. Although human perception remains important after purchase, AI’s growing role as an ‘intermediary filter’ in pre-purchase decisions creates new opportunities for unfair competition and risks undermining consumer welfare. In this context, adapting legal frameworks to AI-mediated commerce should involve going beyond general transparency requirements, clarifying how liability may arise, ensuring that trade marks remain visible and rethinking the consumer model so that the protection benchmark it sets remains aligned with market realities.

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & PracticeVol. 21(2)
UCLouvain (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Intellectual Property Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do we still need brands? Revisiting the essential function of trade marks and the consumer model in AI-mediated commerce — Alexandre Piron · Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS